Navalyze · Container · Ship

HERMANN SCHULTE

IMO: 9535187
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 33,802 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.55 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MOL GRATITUDE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hepatica Shipping Limited

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 35,015 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

168

Container median 165 kg/nm (+2%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−22%)

Average speed

15.4 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (+17%)

Fuel per day at sea

62.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,051 t

CO₂ emitted

44,102 t

Distance sailed

83,523 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,427 h

226 days, 62% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 159 kg/nm · median 177 (−10%)

78.8Ranks 985 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.4 kn · median 13.3 (+16%)

9.1Faster than 82% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−10%)

7.22Ranks 987 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports49%
From the EU16%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,407 t

3.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HERMANN SCHULTE
Container median

140.0160.0180.0200.0220.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HERMANN SCHULTE
Container median

13.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HERMANN SCHULTE
Container median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−7%	−7%	+42%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	+2%	+1%	−38%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	−17%	−19%	+254%	−46%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.8 kn	+1%	+6%	−64%	+84%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	+15%	+22%	−21%	+12%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	−9%	−12%	−8%	−23%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	−5%	−10%	−3%	−12%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Hepatica Shipping Limited	9,846	30,921	61,792	4,019	15.4	159	15.1	–
2025	Arthur Park Shipping Pte Ltd	11,761	36,916	74,092	4,817	15.4	159	14.7	–
2024	Hepatica Shipping Limited	8,945	28,172	52,160	3,410	15.3	172	14.5	–
2023	not published	14,051	44,102	83,523	5,427	15.4	168	15.1	–
2022	not published	4,804	15,104	23,605	1,497	15.8	204	28.1	–
2021	not published	13,129	41,159	65,316	4,340	15.0	201	15.3	–
2020	not published	14,454	45,262	82,387	5,806	14.2	175	13.7	–
2019	not published	17,341	54,274	89,837	6,162	14.6	193	17.8	–
2018	not published	18,717	58,661	92,376	6,003	15.4	203	20.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Hepatica Shipping Limited	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2025	Arthur Park Shipping Pte Ltd	14.7	16.3	−10%	987 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	Hepatica Shipping Limited	14.5	17.5	−17%	788 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	15.1	19.4	−22%	731 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	28.1	19.1	+47%	1,246 of 1,825	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	15.3	17.9	−15%	734 of 1,781	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	13.7	17.6	−22%	636 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	17.8	18.9	−6%	835 of 1,788	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	20.3	20.2	+0%	856 of 1,705	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.