Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

NORDIC WISMAR

IMO
9539482
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
32,173 t
Port of registry
Singapore
Technical efficiency
EIV 19.11 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 32,173 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
168.8 kg/nm
Container median 185.8 kg/nm (−9%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
16.34
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.90 (−9%)
Average speed
12.9 kn
Container median 14.1 kn (−9%)
Fuel per day at sea
52.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,622 t
CO₂ emitted
5,051 t
Distance sailed
9,609 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
747 h
31 days, 9% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2021

Set against all 1,781 container ships with a full-year 2021 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 168.8 kg/nm · median 185.8 (−9%)
80.1Ranks 819 of 1,781, lowest first324.7
Average speedThis ship 12.9 kn · median 14.1 (−9%)
10.7Faster than 34% of container ships16.9
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 16.34 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.90 (−9%)
7.81Ranks 807 of 1,781, lowest first49.96
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU25%
  • Into the EU74%
  • At berth in the EU1%
Fuel burned laden
99%
1% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
1.4%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • NORDIC WISMAR
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • NORDIC WISMAR
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • NORDIC WISMAR
  • Container median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2020→2021−1.6 kn−13%−23%−33%−14%1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2021not published1,6225,0519,60974712.9168.816.3499%
2020not published2,8088,84914,40499114.5195.018.92–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2021not published16.3417.90−9%807 of 1,781ABSB
2020not published18.9217.58+8%965 of 1,797ABSB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

NORDIC WISMAR (IMO 9539482): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2020–2021 | Navalyze