Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

NAVIN OSPREY

IMO: 9543316
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 5,229 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.03 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Bright Denizcilik ve Gemi Isletmeciligi A.S.

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,229 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

34.4 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 84.6 kg/nm (−59%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

20.68

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.09 (+156%)

Average speed

7.2 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.6 kn (−32%)

Fuel per day at sea

5.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

686 t

CO₂ emitted

2,157 t

2,191 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

19,947 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,768 h

115 days, 32% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 34.4 kg/nm · median 84.6 (−59%)

61.8Ranks 19 of 3,089, lowest first119.4

Average speedThis ship 7.2 kn · median 10.6 (−32%)

8.8Faster than 3% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.68 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+156%)

4.85Ranks 2,935 of 3,089, lowest first15.76

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports16%
From the EU32%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU7%

62% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,331 t).

Fuel burned laden

71%

29% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

7.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

NAVIN OSPREY
Bulk carrier median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

NAVIN OSPREY
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NAVIN OSPREY
Bulk carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	−1.6 kn	−15%	−31%	+2%	−31%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	+9%	+5%	+77%	+33%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+24%	+17%	−53%	+12%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	−8%	+0%	+1%	−9%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	+31%	+38%	−39%	+50%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 31%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.8 kn	−15%	+6%	+16%	−20%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Bright Denizcilik ve Gemi Isletmeciligi A.S.	552	1,758	18,196	2,198	8.3	30.4	24.61	–
2024	Bright Denizcilik ve Gemi Isletmeciligi A.S.	686	2,157	19,947	2,768	7.2	34.4	20.68	71%
2023	not published	787	2,476	19,497	2,215	8.8	40.4	30.12	–
2022	not published	409	1,296	10,987	1,214	9.1	37.2	22.63	–
2021	not published	704	2,232	23,467	2,433	9.6	30.0	20.29	–
2020	not published	760	2,413	23,224	2,636	8.8	32.7	22.36	79%
2019	not published	946	2,978	37,846	4,523	8.4	25.0	14.94	74%
2018	not published	951	2,991	32,507	4,892	6.6	29.3	18.64	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Bright Denizcilik ve Gemi Isletmeciligi A.S.	–	–	–	–	ICS Verification Services	B
2024	Bright Denizcilik ve Gemi Isletmeciligi A.S.	20.68	8.09	+156%	2,935 of 3,089	RINA	B
2023	not published	30.12	8.27	+264%	3,449 of 3,548	RINA	B
2022	not published	22.63	8.71	+160%	3,789 of 3,968	RINA	B
2021	not published	20.29	8.57	+137%	3,317 of 3,466	Bureau Veritas	B
2020	not published	22.36	8.24	+171%	3,065 of 3,150	Bureau Veritas	A+B
2019	not published	14.94	8.38	+78%	2,987 of 3,360	Bureau Veritas	B
2018	not published	18.64	8.50	+119%	3,151 of 3,384	Bureau Veritas	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.