Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

BARBRO G

IMO: 9546796
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 16,989 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.63 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC
Former names: PACIFIC HURON, ORTOLAN BETA STRAIT

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Victoria Marine Ship Management Germany GmbH & Co KG

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 14,466 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

102

Bulk carrier median 92.4 kg/nm (+10%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

22.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.50 (+159%)

Average speed

7.6 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.4 kn (−27%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,148 t

CO₂ emitted

12,985 t

Distance sailed

40,819 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,372 h

224 days, 61% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 65.7 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−20%)

61.0Ranks 625 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 10.6 kn · median 10.7 (−1%)

8.8Faster than 45% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+55%)

4.80Ranks 2,979 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU32%
Into the EU26%
At berth in the EU30%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3,958 t

30.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BARBRO G
Bulk carrier median

40.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BARBRO G
Bulk carrier median

7.08.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BARBRO G
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	+11%	+13%	+86%	−13%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	−27%	−30%	−55%	+8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	+13%	+14%	−33%	+7%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−4%	−9%	−19%	+6%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+1%	−2%	+191%	−9%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	−0%	+3%	−10%	−33%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+3.5 kn	−26%	+8%	−65%	−14%	3.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Victoria Marine Ship Management Germany GmbH & Co KG	1,132	3,582	17,226	1,632	10.6	65.7	12.2	–
2024	Victoria Marine Ship Management Germany GmbH & Co KG	548	1,722	9,270	894	10.4	59.2	14.2	–
2023	not published	1,658	5,217	20,383	1,905	10.7	81.3	13.1	–
2022	not published	2,191	6,899	30,412	2,879	10.6	72.0	12.3	–
2021	not published	2,818	8,890	37,435	3,358	11.1	75.3	11.6	–
2020	not published	963	3,028	12,871	1,123	11.5	74.8	12.7	–
2019	not published	1,076	3,391	14,330	1,292	11.1	75.1	19.0	–
2018	not published	4,148	12,985	40,819	5,372	7.6	102	22.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Victoria Marine Ship Management Germany GmbH & Co KG	12.2	7.90	+55%	2,979 of 3,611	DNV	B+C
2024	Victoria Marine Ship Management Germany GmbH & Co KG	14.2	8.09	+75%	2,700 of 3,089	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	13.1	8.27	+59%	2,916 of 3,548	DNV	C
2022	not published	12.3	8.71	+41%	3,051 of 3,968	DNV	C
2021	not published	11.6	8.57	+35%	2,676 of 3,466	DNV	C
2020	not published	12.7	8.24	+54%	2,665 of 3,150	DNV	A
2019	not published	19.0	8.38	+126%	3,165 of 3,360	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	22.0	8.50	+159%	3,225 of 3,384	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.