Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

ELONG ELONG

IMO: 9548732
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 13,495 t
Flag (estimated): Barbados
Port of registry: Bridgetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.61 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Marine Repair & Supply Pte Ltd

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,514 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

50.7

Bulk carrier median 86.5 kg/nm (−41%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.24 (+88%)

Average speed

9.5 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

11.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

915 t

CO₂ emitted

2,933 t

Distance sailed

18,046 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,894 h

79 days, 22% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 43.0 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−48%)

61.0Ranks 40 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 9.2 kn · median 10.7 (−14%)

8.8Faster than 14% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+29%)

4.80Ranks 2,622 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports35%
From the EU54%
Into the EU7%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

93 t

3.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ELONG ELONG
Bulk carrier median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ELONG ELONG
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ELONG ELONG
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.2 kn	−20%	−9%	−12%	−14%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.6 kn	+9%	+18%	+16%	−27%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.7 kn	−1%	−19%	+45%	−32%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+2.5 kn	−14%	+18%	+308%	−0%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.9 kn	+14%	−21%	−80%	+55%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.4 kn	−6%	+26%	+194%	−27%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	–	–	–	–	–

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Marine Repair & Supply Pte Ltd	911	2,920	21,174	2,290	9.2	43.0	10.2	–
2024	Marine Repair & Supply Pte Ltd	1,305	4,184	24,177	3,006	8.0	54.0	11.9	–
2023	not published	1,036	3,321	20,904	2,832	7.4	49.5	16.4	–
2022	not published	721	2,312	14,462	1,590	9.1	49.9	24.0	–
2021	not published	205	657	3,545	536	6.6	57.8	24.0	–
2020	not published	915	2,933	18,046	1,894	9.5	50.7	15.5	–
2019	not published	330	1,058	6,128	859	7.1	53.9	21.1	–
2018	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Marine Repair & Supply Pte Ltd	10.2	7.90	+29%	2,622 of 3,611	China Classification Society	A
2024	Marine Repair & Supply Pte Ltd	11.9	8.09	+48%	2,502 of 3,089	China Classification Society	A
2023	not published	16.4	8.27	+98%	3,158 of 3,548	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	24.0	8.71	+175%	3,817 of 3,968	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	24.0	8.57	+180%	3,372 of 3,466	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	15.5	8.24	+88%	2,873 of 3,150	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	21.1	8.38	+152%	3,216 of 3,360	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.