Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

FRONTIER JACARANDA

IMO: 9552393
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 118,816 t
Flag (estimated): Japan
Port of registry: Tokyo
Technical efficiency: EIV 2.95 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ASAHI SHIPPING CO., LTD.

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 70,540 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

157

Bulk carrier median 91.4 kg/nm (+72%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.05

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.57 (−18%)

Average speed

11.8 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.5 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

44.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,695 t

CO₂ emitted

5,359 t

Distance sailed

10,776 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

916 h

38 days, 10% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 157 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+90%)

61.0Ranks 3,517 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 10.7 (+0%)

8.8Faster than 52% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 4.13 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (−48%)

4.80Ranks 195 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU52%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

72 t

1.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

FRONTIER JACARANDA
Bulk carrier median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FRONTIER JACARANDA
Bulk carrier median

10.010.511.011.512.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

FRONTIER JACARANDA
Bulk carrier median

2.04.06.08.010.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	+6%	+4%	−2%	–	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.6 kn	+10%	+3%	+86%	–	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	−21%	−16%	+30%	−30%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	+9%	+1%	−30%	−24%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.7 kn	−8%	+6%	+172%	+122%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.7 kn	+1%	−5%	−54%	−48%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.8 kn	+26%	+35%	−53%	+93%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 26%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	ASAHI SHIPPING CO., LTD.	2,790	8,711	17,752	1,657	10.7	157	4.13	–
2024	ASAHI SHIPPING CO., LTD.	2,692	8,430	18,150	1,655	11.0	148	–	–
2023	not published	1,322	4,177	9,774	839	11.6	135	3.76	–
2022	not published	1,283	4,056	7,496	684	11.0	171	5.36	–
2021	not published	1,695	5,359	10,776	916	11.8	157	7.05	–
2020	not published	679	2,143	3,967	391	10.1	171	3.17	–
2019	not published	1,468	4,588	8,673	806	10.8	169	6.05	–
2018	not published	2,467	7,693	18,338	1,831	10.0	135	3.14	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ASAHI SHIPPING CO., LTD.	4.13	7.90	−48%	195 of 3,611	ClassNK	C
2024	ASAHI SHIPPING CO., LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	3.76	8.27	−55%	138 of 3,548	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	5.36	8.71	−38%	484 of 3,968	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	7.05	8.57	−18%	1,012 of 3,466	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	3.17	8.24	−62%	41 of 3,150	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	6.05	8.38	−28%	692 of 3,360	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	3.14	8.50	−63%	85 of 3,384	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.