Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

ORIENTAL ACACIA

IMO: 9553048
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 7,396 t
Flag (estimated): Cayman Islands
Port of registry: George Town
Technical efficiency: EEDI 11.00 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NEW SHIPPING KAISHA, LTD.

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,310 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

64.6

Chemical tanker median 85.7 kg/nm (−25%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

32.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.2 (+99%)

Average speed

12.7 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.4 kn (+11%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,714 t

CO₂ emitted

11,693 t

Distance sailed

57,514 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,537 h

189 days, 52% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 64.2 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−19%)

52.8Ranks 364 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 11.1 (+2%)

8.8Faster than 57% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 27.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+83%)

7.93Ranks 1,134 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports56%
From the EU15%
Into the EU13%
At berth in the EU17%

Fuel burned laden

2,589 t

70% of all fuel; 30% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,939 t

16.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ORIENTAL ACACIA
Chemical tanker median

40.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ORIENTAL ACACIA
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ORIENTAL ACACIA
Chemical tanker median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	−10%	−18%	−19%	−10%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	+22%	+23%	−6%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−8%	−8%	+35%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	−3%	−4%	−14%	−25%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	+2%	+1%	−11%	+26%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	−3%	−2%	+12%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.1 kn	−43%	−38%	+5%	−44%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 43%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	NEW SHIPPING KAISHA, LTD.	2,886	9,129	44,935	3,968	11.3	64.2	27.5	–
2024	NEW SHIPPING KAISHA, LTD.	3,962	12,423	55,520	4,437	12.5	71.4	30.5	–
2023	not published	3,478	10,897	59,293	4,805	12.3	58.7	31.0	–
2022	not published	2,815	8,848	44,008	3,560	12.4	64.0	30.5	65%
2021	not published	3,358	10,584	50,906	4,066	12.5	66.0	40.5	63%
2020	not published	3,714	11,693	57,514	4,537	12.7	64.6	32.2	70%
2019	not published	3,439	10,804	51,571	4,109	12.5	66.7	30.9	82%
2018	not published	5,759	18,071	48,933	4,279	11.4	118	55.1	41%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	NEW SHIPPING KAISHA, LTD.	27.5	15.0	+83%	1,134 of 1,460	ClassNK	B
2024	NEW SHIPPING KAISHA, LTD.	30.5	16.7	+82%	996 of 1,274	ClassNK	B
2023	not published	31.0	16.2	+91%	1,042 of 1,314	ClassNK	B
2022	not published	30.5	16.1	+90%	1,138 of 1,409	ClassNK	B
2021	not published	40.5	16.7	+143%	1,203 of 1,343	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	32.2	16.2	+99%	1,081 of 1,312	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	30.9	17.3	+78%	1,052 of 1,321	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	55.1	17.1	+222%	1,225 of 1,294	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.