Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

GENCO AUVERGNE

IMO: 9557123
Type: Bulk carrier
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EIV 4.92 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

97.4 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

11.2 kn

Fuel per day at sea

26.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

118 t

CO₂ emitted

375 t

Distance sailed

1,216 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

108 h

5 days, 1% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2019

Set against all 3,360 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 109.2 kg/nm · median 91.2 (+20%)

67.0Ranks 2,607 of 3,360, lowest first134.9

Average speedThis ship 9.1 kn · median 10.3 (−12%)

7.4Faster than 28% of bulk carrier ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.45 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.38 (−11%)

4.89Ranks 1,290 of 3,360, lowest first15.46

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU80%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU20%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

19.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

GENCO AUVERGNE
Bulk carrier median

90.095.0100.0105.0110.0

’182018’192019’232023

Average speed, kn

GENCO AUVERGNE
Bulk carrier median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’232023

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GENCO AUVERGNE
Bulk carrier median

7.08.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2019→2023	+2.1 kn	−11%	+10%	−88%	–	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.0 kn	+9%	+22%	−45%	−27%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2023	not published	118	375	1,216	108	11.2	97.4	–	–
2019	not published	1,076	3,360	9,855	1,080	9.1	109.2	7.45	–
2018	not published	1,810	5,665	18,042	2,218	8.1	100.3	10.22	86%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	ABS	A
2019	not published	7.45	8.38	−11%	1,290 of 3,360	ABS	A
2018	not published	10.22	8.50	+20%	2,301 of 3,384	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.