Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

EFE

IMO: 9558763
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 4,105 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.26 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: AZIZ TORLAK

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Torlak Gemi Isletmecilik San

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,083 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

79.9

Chemical tanker median 83.0 kg/nm (−4%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

62.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.7 (+274%)

Average speed

8.0 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.2 kn (−29%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

747 t

CO₂ emitted

2,381 t

Distance sailed

9,348 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,171 h

49 days, 13% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 47.2 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−41%)

52.8Ranks 73 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 7.6 kn · median 11.1 (−32%)

8.8Faster than 5% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 36.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+143%)

7.93Ranks 1,259 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports43%
From the EU19%
Into the EU30%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

197 t

8.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EFE
Chemical tanker median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EFE
Chemical tanker median

2.55.07.510.012.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EFE
Chemical tanker median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−3.7 kn	−6%	−37%	−17%	−9%	3.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	−15%	−10%	+393%	−14%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.3 kn	−8%	+5%	−43%	−27%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.3 kn	−20%	−6%	+39%	+4%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.0 kn	+44%	+15%	−54%	+46%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 44%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+6.8 kn	−38%	+93%	+122%	−25%	6.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 38%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.0 kn	+36%	−30%	−78%	+40%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 36%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Torlak Gemi Isletmecilik San	1,446	4,607	30,647	4,041	7.6	47.2	36.6	–
2024	Torlak Gemi Isletmecilik San	1,849	5,830	36,789	3,260	11.3	50.2	40.4	67%
2023	not published	441	1,380	7,463	701	10.6	59.1	47.2	–
2022	not published	833	2,611	12,981	1,391	9.3	64.1	64.8	–
2021	not published	747	2,381	9,348	1,171	8.0	79.9	62.4	–
2020	not published	1,123	3,601	20,204	2,021	10.0	55.6	42.7	–
2019	not published	820	2,585	9,120	2,868	3.2	89.9	57.3	–
2018	not published	2,763	8,693	41,830	6,742	6.2	66.1	41.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Torlak Gemi Isletmecilik San	36.6	15.0	+143%	1,259 of 1,460	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2024	Torlak Gemi Isletmecilik San	40.4	16.7	+141%	1,129 of 1,274	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2023	not published	47.2	16.2	+191%	1,217 of 1,314	Verifavia	B
2022	not published	64.8	16.1	+303%	1,378 of 1,409	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	62.4	16.7	+274%	1,308 of 1,343	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	42.7	16.2	+164%	1,198 of 1,312	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	57.3	17.3	+231%	1,264 of 1,321	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	41.0	17.1	+139%	1,137 of 1,294	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.