Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

CKR CANGA

IMO: 9560730
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 4,372 t
Port of registry: Port Vila
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.66 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: RIO CONGUE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DCC DENIZCILIK SAN. VE TIC. LTD. STI.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,372 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

36.8 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−55%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

26.98

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+242%)

Average speed

10.8 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

9.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

752 t

CO₂ emitted

2,411 t

2,448 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

20,441 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,888 h

79 days, 22% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 36.8 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−55%)

61.0Ranks 22 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 10.7 (+1%)

8.8Faster than 57% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 26.98 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+242%)

4.80Ranks 3,462 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU43%
Into the EU37%
At berth in the EU11%

60% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,442 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

10.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CKR CANGA
Bulk carrier median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CKR CANGA
Bulk carrier median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CKR CANGA
Bulk carrier median

0.010.020.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+2.1 kn	−25%	−6%	+16%	+6%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	+13%	+9%	−28%	+2%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	−1%	−7%	−11%	+22%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+1%	+1%	+53%	+15%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	−13%	−7%	−46%	−28%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.7 kn	+7%	+16%	+217%	−14%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	+2%	−1%	−39%	+76%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	DCC DENIZCILIK SAN. VE TIC. LTD. STI.	752	2,411	20,441	1,888	10.8	36.8	26.98	–
2024	DCC DENIZCILIK SAN. VE TIC. LTD. STI.	867	2,780	17,679	2,042	8.7	49.0	25.41	–
2023	not published	1,071	3,432	24,662	2,747	9.0	43.4	25.02	–
2022	not published	1,211	3,884	27,574	2,882	9.6	43.9	20.44	–
2021	not published	779	2,497	17,997	1,873	9.6	43.3	17.75	–
2020	not published	1,652	5,296	33,085	3,718	8.9	49.9	24.49	–
2019	not published	488	1,566	10,435	1,273	8.2	46.8	28.39	–
2018	not published	782	2,508	17,123	2,025	8.5	45.7	16.14	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	DCC DENIZCILIK SAN. VE TIC. LTD. STI.	26.98	7.89	+242%	3,462 of 3,610	Verifavia	A
2024	DCC DENIZCILIK SAN. VE TIC. LTD. STI.	25.41	8.09	+214%	3,003 of 3,089	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	25.02	8.27	+203%	3,399 of 3,548	RINA	A
2022	not published	20.44	8.71	+135%	3,730 of 3,968	RINA	A
2021	not published	17.75	8.57	+107%	3,230 of 3,466	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2020	not published	24.49	8.24	+197%	3,084 of 3,150	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	28.39	8.38	+239%	3,289 of 3,360	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	16.14	8.50	+90%	3,049 of 3,384	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.