Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

BOCHEM SINGAPURA

IMO: 9565625
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 13,981 t
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EIV 10.73 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 13,981 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

84.9 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 88.3 kg/nm (−4%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

19.04

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.32 (+10%)

Average speed

12.9 kn

Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (+28%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,013 t

CO₂ emitted

3,178 t

Distance sailed

11,937 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

927 h

39 days, 11% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,321 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 84.9 kg/nm · median 88.3 (−4%)

57.3Ranks 576 of 1,321, lowest first120.9

Average speedThis ship 12.9 kn · median 10.1 (+28%)

6.3Faster than 92% of chemical tanker ships12.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 19.04 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.32 (+10%)

9.31Ranks 760 of 1,321, lowest first43.27

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports20%
From the EU54%
Into the EU15%
At berth in the EU10%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

10.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

BOCHEM SINGAPURA
Chemical tanker median

75.080.085.090.095.0

’182018’192019

Average speed, kn

BOCHEM SINGAPURA
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BOCHEM SINGAPURA
Chemical tanker median

15.016.017.018.019.020.0

’182018’192019

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	+10%	+12%	−53%	+23%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2019	not published	1,013	3,178	11,937	927	12.9	84.9	19.04	–
2018	not published	1,975	6,191	25,573	2,022	12.6	77.2	15.51	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2019	not published	19.04	17.32	+10%	760 of 1,321	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	15.51	17.14	−10%	533 of 1,294	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.