Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

CORELIT

IMO: 9573799
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 763 t
Flag (estimated): Barbados
Port of registry: Bridgetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.80 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CLIPPER IWAGI, QUEEN ALESIA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hellenic Glamor Ship Management LLC

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 19,149 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

79.7

Bulk carrier median 91.4 kg/nm (−13%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.57 (+53%)

Average speed

10.5 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.5 kn (−9%)

Fuel per day at sea

20.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,298 t

CO₂ emitted

7,250 t

Distance sailed

28,838 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,759 h

115 days, 31% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 70.7 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−14%)

61.0Ranks 917 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 10.7 (+0%)

8.8Faster than 49% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 296 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+3,653%)

4.80Ranks 3,604 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU28%
Into the EU60%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

333 t

4.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CORELIT
Bulk carrier median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CORELIT
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CORELIT
Bulk carrier median

0.0100200300

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+3.4 kn	+15%	+69%	−85%	+1,731%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−3.6 kn	−11%	−40%	−58%	−20%	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−5%	−8%	+16%	+27%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.6 kn	−9%	−3%	−46%	+21%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.9 kn	+48%	+25%	+103%	+11%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 48%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2020	+1.7 kn	−33%	−23%	+154%	−18%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 33%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Hellenic Glamor Ship Management LLC	82	261	1,156	108	10.7	70.7	296	–
2024part-year	Alma Shipmanagement & Trading	465	1,457	7,573	1,040	7.3	61.5	16.2	–
2024	Hellenic Glamor Ship Management LLC	465	1,457	7,573	1,040	7.3	61.5	16.2	–
2023	not published	1,242	3,879	18,048	1,662	10.9	68.8	20.2	–
2022	not published	1,135	3,562	15,577	1,405	11.1	72.8	15.9	–
2021	not published	2,298	7,250	28,838	2,759	10.5	79.7	13.1	–
2020	not published	765	2,397	14,232	1,145	12.4	53.7	11.8	–
2018	not published	451	1,427	5,605	522	10.7	80.5	14.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hellenic Glamor Ship Management LLC	296	7.90	+3,653%	3,604 of 3,611	ClassNK	A
2024part-year	Alma Shipmanagement & Trading	–	–	–	–	ICS Verification Services	A
2024	Hellenic Glamor Ship Management LLC	16.2	8.09	+100%	2,792 of 3,089	ClassNK	–
2023	not published	20.2	8.27	+144%	3,293 of 3,548	ICS Verification Services	A
2022	not published	15.9	8.71	+82%	3,504 of 3,968	ICS Verification Services	A
2021	not published	13.1	8.57	+53%	2,915 of 3,466	ICS Verification Services	A
2020	not published	11.8	8.24	+43%	2,542 of 3,150	ICS Verification Services	A
2018	not published	14.4	8.50	+69%	2,944 of 3,384	ClassNK	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.