Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

NING HAI WAN

IMO: 9578385
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 2,156 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.75 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: COSCO Shipping Asphalt (Hainan) Co., Ltd · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,156 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

53.4 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 129.0 kg/nm (−59%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

77.73

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.06 (+864%)

Average speed

10.4 kn

Oil tanker median 10.9 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

13.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,025 t

CO₂ emitted

6,358 t

6,458 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

37,943 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,635 h

151 days, 41% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,787 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 53.4 kg/nm · median 129.0 (−59%)

79.5Ranks 45 of 1,787, lowest first193.6

Average speedThis ship 10.4 kn · median 10.9 (−5%)

8.1Faster than 38% of oil tanker ships12.3

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 77.73 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.06 (+864%)

4.44Ranks 1,782 of 1,787, lowest first25.70

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports67%
From the EU11%
Into the EU8%
At berth in the EU13%

90% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,732 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

13.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

NING HAI WAN
Oil tanker median

25.050.075.0100.0125.0150.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

NING HAI WAN
Oil tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NING HAI WAN
Oil tanker median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	+2%	+1%	+10%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	−6%	−4%	−12%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.9 kn	+20%	+10%	−18%	+13%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+16%	+12%	+139%	–	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.4 kn	−18%	−6%	−60%	–	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.2 kn	+2%	+16%	+43%	+10%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	COSCO Shipping Asphalt (Hainan) Co., Ltd	2,025	6,358	37,943	3,635	10.4	53.4	77.73	–
2023	not published	1,810	5,749	34,487	3,267	10.6	52.5	74.20	–
2022	not published	2,179	6,984	39,055	3,788	10.3	55.8	70.69	–
2021	not published	2,226	7,030	47,804	4,286	11.2	46.6	62.39	–
2020	not published	805	2,514	19,981	1,731	11.5	40.3	134.62	–
2019	not published	2,437	7,638	49,674	4,897	10.1	49.1	72.76	–
2018	not published	1,674	5,239	34,654	3,887	8.9	48.3	66.30	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	COSCO Shipping Asphalt (Hainan) Co., Ltd	77.73	8.06	+864%	1,782 of 1,787	China Classification Society	A
2023	not published	74.20	8.44	+779%	1,786 of 1,797	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	70.69	8.51	+731%	1,936 of 1,961	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	62.39	8.86	+604%	1,757 of 1,789	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	72.76	8.83	+724%	1,898 of 1,919	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	66.30	8.86	+648%	1,758 of 1,779	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.