Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

GOLDEN MALAK

IMO: 9578995
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 8,772 t
Port of registry: Freetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.59 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: PERSENK

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GOLDEN MALAK SHIPTRADE LTD

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,772 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

66.2 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−20%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

23.90

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+203%)

Average speed

9.6 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

730 t

CO₂ emitted

2,312 t

2,347 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

11,026 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,146 h

48 days, 13% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 66.2 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−20%)

61.0Ranks 646 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 9.6 kn · median 10.7 (−10%)

8.8Faster than 20% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 23.90 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+203%)

4.80Ranks 3,433 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU63%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU6%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,222 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

GOLDEN MALAK
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GOLDEN MALAK
Bulk carrier median

9.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GOLDEN MALAK
Bulk carrier median

0.010.020.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	−10%	−15%	−39%	+109%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	+9%	+10%	+37%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	+0%	+9%	−8%	+21%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.4 kn	+6%	−7%	−66%	+3%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	+3%	+16%	+173%	+9%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	−12%	−10%	−37%	+831%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	+9%	+3%	+24%	−10%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	GOLDEN MALAK SHIPTRADE LTD	730	2,312	11,026	1,146	9.6	66.2	23.90	–
2024part-year	Navigation Maritime Bulgare	1,333	4,183	18,071	1,764	10.2	73.8	11.43	–
2024	GOLDEN MALAK SHIPTRADE LTD	1,333	4,183	18,071	1,764	10.2	73.8	11.43	–
2023	not published	895	2,832	13,218	1,311	10.1	67.7	12.22	–
2022	not published	975	3,125	14,441	1,546	9.3	67.5	10.12	–
2021	not published	2,700	8,655	42,368	3,973	10.7	63.7	9.86	–
2020	not published	955	3,027	15,494	1,630	9.5	61.6	9.03	–
2019	not published	1,729	5,417	24,652	2,657	9.3	70.1	0.97	–
2018	not published	1,287	4,031	19,957	2,049	9.7	64.5	1.08	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	GOLDEN MALAK SHIPTRADE LTD	23.90	7.89	+203%	3,433 of 3,610	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2024part-year	Navigation Maritime Bulgare	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2024	GOLDEN MALAK SHIPTRADE LTD	11.43	8.09	+41%	2,425 of 3,089	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2023	not published	12.22	8.27	+48%	2,803 of 3,548	DNV	B
2022	not published	10.12	8.71	+16%	2,520 of 3,968	DNV	B
2021	not published	9.86	8.57	+15%	2,201 of 3,466	RINA	B
2020	not published	9.03	8.24	+10%	1,881 of 3,150	RINA	B
2019	not published	0.97	8.38	−88%	7 of 3,360	RINA	B
2018	not published	1.08	8.50	−87%	14 of 3,384	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.