Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

PVT GLORIA

IMO: 9583691
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 26,725 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.18 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: VULLY

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: THANG LONG MARITIME JSC

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 27,922 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

76.1

Bulk carrier median 86.5 kg/nm (−12%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.49

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.24 (+3%)

Average speed

11.8 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

586 t

CO₂ emitted

1,825 t

Distance sailed

7,700 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

650 h

27 days, 7% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 69.3 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−16%)

61.0Ranks 816 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 9.5 kn · median 10.7 (−11%)

8.8Faster than 18% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.12 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+3%)

4.80Ranks 1,892 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU36%
Into the EU64%
At berth in the EU0%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4 t

0.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PVT GLORIA
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PVT GLORIA
Bulk carrier median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PVT GLORIA
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.5 kn	+10%	−13%	+174%	−59%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.5 kn	−24%	−13%	−46%	+102%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	+5%	−4%	+22%	+16%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	−11%	−17%	−44%	−16%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	+18%	+22%	+240%	+19%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2020	+1.2 kn	−7%	+3%	−58%	−21%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	THANG LONG MARITIME JSC	1,844	5,776	26,615	2,798	9.5	69.3	8.12	95%
2024	THANG LONG MARITIME JSC	613	1,910	9,696	810	12.0	63.2	20.0	–
2023	not published	1,500	4,679	17,941	1,715	10.5	83.6	9.90	–
2022	not published	1,170	3,647	14,690	1,289	11.4	79.7	8.54	–
2021	not published	2,351	7,355	26,158	2,140	12.2	89.9	10.1	–
2020	not published	586	1,825	7,700	650	11.8	76.1	8.49	–
2018	not published	1,485	4,662	18,153	1,706	10.6	81.8	10.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	THANG LONG MARITIME JSC	8.12	7.90	+3%	1,892 of 3,611	ABS	A
2024	THANG LONG MARITIME JSC	20.0	8.09	+147%	2,925 of 3,089	ABS	A
2023	not published	9.90	8.27	+20%	2,324 of 3,548	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	8.54	8.71	−2%	1,909 of 3,968	RINA	A
2021	not published	10.1	8.57	+18%	2,305 of 3,466	RINA	A
2020	not published	8.49	8.24	+3%	1,657 of 3,150	RINA	A
2018	not published	10.8	8.50	+27%	2,450 of 3,384	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.