Navalyze · Container · Ship

SAMSKIP TOUBKAL

IMO: 9584475
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 6,122 t
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 22.59 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: HEINRICH SCHEPERS, HEINRICH

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS 'Wes Heinrich' Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,122 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

82.6 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−53%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

42.86

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+163%)

Average speed

11.5 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,257 t

CO₂ emitted

13,519 t

13,729 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

51,526 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,461 h

186 days, 51% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 82.6 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−53%)

78.8Ranks 285 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 11.5 kn · median 13.3 (−14%)

9.1Faster than 27% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 42.86 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+163%)

7.22Ranks 1,932 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports83%
From the EU11%
Into the EU1%
At berth in the EU5%

92% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (12,497 t).

Fuel burned laden

100%

0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

4.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SAMSKIP TOUBKAL
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SAMSKIP TOUBKAL
Container median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SAMSKIP TOUBKAL
Container median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.9 kn	−1%	−8%	+2%	−16%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	−2%	−4%	−22%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+1.0 kn	−2%	+7%	+25%	+68%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	−2%	−6%	−4%	−14%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	−1%	−8%	−25%	−11%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.7 kn	+6%	+23%	+27%	+21%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.9 kn	−2%	+6%	+14%	−10%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MS 'Wes Heinrich' Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	4,257	13,519	51,526	4,461	11.5	82.6	42.86	100%
2024	MS 'Wes Heinrich' Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	4,220	13,229	50,376	4,058	12.4	83.8	50.77	–
2023	not published	5,568	17,458	64,815	5,129	12.6	85.9	57.05	–
2022	not published	4,572	14,438	52,018	4,489	11.6	87.9	34.00	–
2021	not published	4,899	15,493	54,441	4,520	12.0	90.0	39.41	–
2020	not published	6,608	20,837	72,476	5,633	12.9	91.2	44.42	–
2019	not published	4,900	15,470	57,096	5,108	11.2	85.8	36.72	–
2018	not published	4,385	13,834	50,019	4,847	10.3	87.7	40.69	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MS 'Wes Heinrich' Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	42.86	16.30	+163%	1,932 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	MS 'Wes Heinrich' Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	50.77	17.52	+190%	1,767 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	57.05	19.40	+194%	1,760 of 1,899	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	34.00	19.13	+78%	1,380 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	39.41	17.90	+120%	1,476 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	44.42	17.58	+153%	1,535 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	36.72	18.88	+94%	1,373 of 1,788	Bureau Veritas	B
2018	not published	40.69	20.22	+101%	1,361 of 1,705	Bureau Veritas	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.