Navalyze · Container · Ship

SAMSKIP TOUBKAL

IMO: 9584475
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 6,122 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 22.59 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: HEINRICH SCHEPERS, HEINRICH

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS 'Wes Heinrich' Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,472 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

91.2

Container median 172 kg/nm (−47%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

44.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (+153%)

Average speed

12.9 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

28.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,608 t

CO₂ emitted

20,837 t

Distance sailed

72,476 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,633 h

235 days, 64% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 82.6 kg/nm · median 177 (−53%)

78.8Ranks 285 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.5 kn · median 13.3 (−14%)

9.1Faster than 27% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 42.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+163%)

7.22Ranks 1,932 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports96%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

919 t

4.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SAMSKIP TOUBKAL
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SAMSKIP TOUBKAL
Container median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SAMSKIP TOUBKAL
Container median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.9 kn	−1%	−8%	+2%	−16%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	−2%	−4%	−22%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+1.0 kn	−2%	+7%	+25%	+68%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	−2%	−6%	−4%	−14%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	−1%	−8%	−25%	−11%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.7 kn	+6%	+23%	+27%	+21%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.9 kn	−2%	+6%	+14%	−10%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MS 'Wes Heinrich' Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	4,257	13,519	51,526	4,461	11.5	82.6	42.9	100%
2024	MS 'Wes Heinrich' Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	4,220	13,229	50,376	4,058	12.4	83.8	50.8	–
2023	not published	5,568	17,458	64,815	5,129	12.6	85.9	57.1	–
2022	not published	4,572	14,438	52,018	4,489	11.6	87.9	34.0	–
2021	not published	4,899	15,493	54,441	4,520	12.0	90.0	39.4	–
2020	not published	6,608	20,837	72,476	5,633	12.9	91.2	44.4	–
2019	not published	4,900	15,470	57,096	5,108	11.2	85.8	36.7	–
2018	not published	4,385	13,834	50,019	4,847	10.3	87.7	40.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MS 'Wes Heinrich' Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	42.9	16.3	+163%	1,932 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	MS 'Wes Heinrich' Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	50.8	17.5	+190%	1,767 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	57.1	19.4	+194%	1,760 of 1,899	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	34.0	19.1	+78%	1,380 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	39.4	17.9	+120%	1,476 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	44.4	17.6	+153%	1,535 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	36.7	18.9	+94%	1,373 of 1,788	Bureau Veritas	B
2018	not published	40.7	20.2	+101%	1,361 of 1,705	Bureau Veritas	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.