Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

TRANSEUROPE

IMO: 9586588
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.67 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ZEALAND ALEXIA, BULKER BEE 20

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Rix Bulk Management SIA

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

74.0 kg/nm

General cargo median 58.7 kg/nm (+26%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

11.17

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 19.25 (−42%)

Average speed

9.0 kn

General cargo median 10.5 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

753 t

CO₂ emitted

2,378 t

2,415 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

10,177 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,133 h

47 days, 13% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,111 general cargo ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 74.0 kg/nm · median 58.7 (+26%)

34.9Ranks 800 of 1,111, lowest first87.0

Average speedThis ship 9.0 kn · median 10.5 (−14%)

7.8Faster than 19% of general cargo ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 11.17 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 19.25 (−42%)

7.51Ranks 292 of 1,111, lowest first39.26

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU51%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU4%

34% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (809 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

TRANSEUROPE
General cargo median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

TRANSEUROPE
General cargo median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TRANSEUROPE
General cargo median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	−0.6 kn	+19%	+11%	−72%	−18%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.1 kn	−3%	−13%	+167%	−1%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−3.1 kn	+9%	−15%	−41%	+10%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+5.6 kn	−22%	+32%	−31%	−29%	5.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	+12%	+12%	+68%	+33%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	−0%	−7%	−51%	−8%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Rix Bulk Management SIA	2,205	6,941	32,471	3,269	9.9	67.9	15.75	–
2024part-year	Rix Shipmanagement	293	924	4,713	521	9.1	62.3	–	–
2024	Rix Bulk Management SIA	753	2,378	10,177	1,133	9.0	74.0	–	–
2023	not published	2,241	7,086	36,101	3,755	9.6	62.1	–	–
2022	not published	865	2,725	13,516	1,264	10.7	64.0	–	–
2021	not published	1,335	4,199	22,803	1,655	13.8	58.5	12.63	–
2020	not published	2,467	7,742	33,072	4,027	8.2	74.6	17.73	–
2019	not published	1,317	4,152	19,728	2,408	8.2	66.8	13.34	38%
2018	not published	2,694	8,477	40,263	4,585	8.8	66.9	14.56	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Rix Bulk Management SIA	–	–	–	–	RINA	A
2024part-year	Rix Shipmanagement	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2024	Rix Bulk Management SIA	11.17	19.25	−42%	292 of 1,111	RINA	A
2023	not published	13.67	20.67	−34%	284 of 1,045	DNV	A
2022	not published	13.86	21.57	−36%	234 of 1,034	DNV	A
2021	not published	12.63	8.57	+47%	2,856 of 3,466	DNV	A
2020	not published	17.73	8.24	+115%	2,964 of 3,150	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	13.34	8.38	+59%	2,843 of 3,360	Lloyd's Register	A
2018	not published	14.56	8.50	+71%	2,964 of 3,384	Lloyd's Register	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.