Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

NSM KUMPULA

IMO: 9590802
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 33,558 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.16 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: KUMPULA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HGF DENIZCILIK LTD STI

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 33,558 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

123.6 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 84.6 kg/nm (+46%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.68

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.09 (+44%)

Average speed

10.8 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.6 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

32.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,294 t

CO₂ emitted

4,105 t

4,169 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

10,474 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

970 h

40 days, 11% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 123.6 kg/nm · median 84.6 (+46%)

61.8Ranks 2,814 of 3,089, lowest first119.4

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 10.6 (+2%)

8.8Faster than 57% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.68 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+44%)

4.85Ranks 2,465 of 3,089, lowest first15.76

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports34%
From the EU41%
Into the EU3%
At berth in the EU22%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

22.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

NSM KUMPULA
Bulk carrier median

80.090.0100.0110.0120.0130.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

NSM KUMPULA
Bulk carrier median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NSM KUMPULA
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	+31%	+36%	−79%	−2%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 31%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.2 kn	−10%	+13%	+47%	+77%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.3 kn	−3%	−24%	+21%	−66%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.8 kn	+2%	+24%	−26%	+49%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	+8%	+2%	−8%	+30%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.2 kn	+5%	−7%	−20%	−24%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	HGF DENIZCILIK LTD STI	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024part-year	ESL Shipping Oy	1,294	4,105	10,474	970	10.8	123.6	11.68	–
2024	HGF DENIZCILIK LTD STI	1,294	4,105	10,474	970	10.8	123.6	11.68	–
2023	not published	4,813	15,172	50,839	4,887	10.4	94.7	11.89	–
2022	not published	3,657	11,493	34,648	4,227	8.2	105.5	6.71	–
2021	not published	3,098	9,721	28,583	2,720	10.5	108.4	19.66	–
2020	not published	4,081	12,867	38,589	4,444	8.7	105.8	13.23	–
2019	not published	4,090	12,824	41,909	4,543	9.2	97.6	10.19	–
2018	not published	4,860	15,304	52,367	5,022	10.4	92.8	13.43	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	HGF DENIZCILIK LTD STI	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	B
2024part-year	ESL Shipping Oy	–	–	–	–	DNV	C
2024	HGF DENIZCILIK LTD STI	11.68	8.09	+44%	2,465 of 3,089	Verifavia	B
2023	not published	11.89	8.27	+44%	2,750 of 3,548	DNV	C
2022	not published	6.71	8.71	−23%	1,032 of 3,968	DNV	C
2021	not published	19.66	8.57	+129%	3,296 of 3,466	DNV	C
2020	not published	13.23	8.24	+61%	2,718 of 3,150	Lloyd's Register	C
2019	not published	10.19	8.38	+22%	2,298 of 3,360	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	13.43	8.50	+58%	2,859 of 3,384	Verifavia	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.