Navalyze

Navalyze · Other · Ship

DONGBANG GIANT NO.6

IMO
9593397
Type
Other ship types
Average cargo carried
1,693 t
Port of registry
Jeju
Former names
KOREX SPB NO. 2
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,693 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
111.4 kg/nm
Other median 87.3 kg/nm (+28%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
210
g CO₂/t·nm · Other median 93.54 (+125%)
Average speed
10.5 kn
Other median 11.8 kn (−11%)
Fuel per day at sea
28.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,646 t
CO₂ emitted
8,446 t
Distance sailed
23,757 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,262 h
94 days, 26% of the year

Within the other fleet, 2023

Set against all 116 other ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 111.4 kg/nm · median 87.3 (+28%)
45.7Ranks 86 of 116, lowest first149.1
Average speedThis ship 10.5 kn · median 11.8 (−11%)
8.4Faster than 32% of other ships16.0
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 210.02 g CO₂/t·nm · median 93.54 (+125%)
25.65Ranks 93 of 116, lowest first293.13
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Other medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports61%
  • From the EU32%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU7%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
7.1%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Other median is the middle ship of all other ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • DONGBANG GIANT NO.6
  • Other median

Average speed, kn

  • DONGBANG GIANT NO.6
  • Other median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • DONGBANG GIANT NO.6
  • Other median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2019→2023+4.0 kn+10%+77%−57%−3%4.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+2.7 kn−6%+61%+126%−16%2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2023not published2,6468,44623,7572,26210.5111.4210.02–
2019not published5,63817,59755,5868,5116.5101.4216.00–
2018not published2,6518,27524,5836,4023.8107.8257.16–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOther medianvs OtherRankVerifierMethods
2023not published210.0293.54+125%93 of 116Korean RegisterA
2019not published216.0090.12+140%69 of 96Korean RegisterA
2018not published257.1672.88+253%64 of 87Korean RegisterA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Other ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's other ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

DONGBANG GIANT NO.6 (IMO 9593397): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2023 | Navalyze