Navalyze

Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

STAR LIMA

IMO
9593866
Type
General cargo ship
Port of registry
Bergen
Technical efficiency
EEXI 6.04 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
89.6 kg/nm
General cargo median 59.9 kg/nm (+50%)
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)
9.57
g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 20.67 (−54%)
Average speed
12.8 kn
General cargo median 10.5 kn (+22%)
Fuel per day at sea
27.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,155 t
CO₂ emitted
6,743 t
Distance sailed
24,062 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,877 h
78 days, 21% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,045 general cargo ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 89.6 kg/nm · median 59.9 (+50%)
36.2Ranks 945 of 1,045, lowest first89.2
Average speedThis ship 12.8 kn · median 10.5 (+22%)
7.5Faster than 93% of general cargo ships12.5
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 9.57 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 20.67 (−54%)
8.03Ranks 179 of 1,045, lowest first40.75
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports13%
  • From the EU39%
  • Into the EU43%
  • At berth in the EU5%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
4.8%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • STAR LIMA
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • STAR LIMA
  • General cargo median

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

  • STAR LIMA
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2020→2023+0.8 kn+16%+24%+116%−69%0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020+0.7 kn−4%+2%−40%+59%0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−1.0 kn−18%−25%+8%+102%1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2023not published2,1556,74324,0621,87712.889.6––
2020not published8612,69011,16493012.077.1––
2019not published1,4914,66818,4721,64011.380.7––
2018not published1,6805,26717,1601,39412.397.9––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nmGeneral cargo medianvs General cargoRankVerifierMethods
2023not published9.5720.67−54%179 of 1,045DNVA
2020not published30.5324.50+25%823 of 1,167DNVA
2019not published19.2224.96−23%313 of 1,154DNVA
2018not published9.5024.89−62%84 of 1,044DNVA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

STAR LIMA (IMO 9593866): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2023 | Navalyze