Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

MARINE HORNBILL

IMO: 9594365
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 2,091 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EIV 11.62 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,091 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

49.3 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

73.59

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

11.3 kn

Fuel per day at sea

13.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

590 t

CO₂ emitted

1,844 t

Distance sailed

11,980 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,056 h

44 days, 12% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2018

Set against all 1,044 general cargo ships with a full-year 2018 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 57.6 kg/nm · median 58.4 (−1%)

37.6Ranks 506 of 1,044, lowest first96.4

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 9.7 (+15%)

6.0Faster than 71% of general cargo ships12.7

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 25.97 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 24.89 (+4%)

10.35Ranks 562 of 1,044, lowest first57.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports40%
From the EU30%
Into the EU21%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

8.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MARINE HORNBILL
Bulk carrier median

47.550.052.555.057.560.0

’182018’192019

Average speed, kn

MARINE HORNBILL
Bulk carrier median

9.510.010.511.011.5

’182018’192019

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−14%	−14%	−64%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2019	not published	590	1,844	11,980	1,056	11.3	49.3	73.59	–
2018	not published	1,937	6,053	33,606	2,995	11.2	57.6	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	25.97	24.89	+4%	562 of 1,044	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.