Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC LAGOS X

IMO: 9605152
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 84,952 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.94 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MSC ANTALYA, JUDITH SCHULTE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Judith Oceanway Limited

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 57,189 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

278

Container median 174 kg/nm (+59%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−20%)

Average speed

15.8 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+15%)

Fuel per day at sea

105.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,428 t

CO₂ emitted

54,399 t

Distance sailed

62,704 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,980 h

166 days, 45% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 292 kg/nm · median 177 (+65%)

78.8Ranks 1,932 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.8 kn · median 13.3 (+4%)

9.1Faster than 57% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−34%)

7.22Ranks 662 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports38%
From the EU27%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,584 t

4.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC LAGOS X
Container median

100.0200.0300.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC LAGOS X
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC LAGOS X
Container median

10.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.9 kn	+9%	−5%	−54%	−16%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+6.7 kn	+3%	+82%	+470%	−3%	6.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.2 kn	−1%	−21%	−50%	+13%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.7 kn	+17%	+2%	−24%	−18%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−3.7 kn	−13%	−33%	−75%	+27%	3.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	−8%	−3%	−29%	−27%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	−26%	−27%	+51%	−38%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Judith Oceanway Limited	3,174	9,914	10,867	789	13.8	292	10.7	–
2024	Judith Oceanway Limited	6,388	20,013	23,877	1,517	15.7	268	12.8	–
2023	not published	1,084	3,401	4,191	467	9.0	259	13.2	–
2022	not published	2,189	6,862	8,417	748	11.2	260	11.7	–
2021	not published	2,455	7,659	11,071	858	12.9	222	14.2	–
2020	not published	11,405	35,746	44,607	2,683	16.6	256	11.1	–
2019	not published	17,428	54,399	62,704	3,980	15.8	278	15.2	–
2018	not published	15,544	48,451	41,424	2,602	15.9	375	24.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Judith Oceanway Limited	10.7	16.3	−34%	662 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	Judith Oceanway Limited	12.8	17.5	−27%	673 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	13.2	19.4	−32%	617 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	11.7	19.1	−39%	458 of 1,825	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	14.2	17.9	−21%	650 of 1,781	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	11.1	17.6	−37%	453 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	15.2	18.9	−20%	665 of 1,788	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	24.3	20.2	+20%	1,020 of 1,705	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.