Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

SIGRUN

IMO
9612052
Type
Oil tanker
Average cargo carried
61,250 t
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EEXI 2.85 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
KARVOUNIS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: VLKR Ship Management L.L.C

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 61,250 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
165.6 kg/nm
Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (+29%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
8.44
g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+6%)
Average speed
13.0 kn
Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (+21%)
Fuel per day at sea
51.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
6,997 t
CO₂ emitted
21,841 t
22,185 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
42,250 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,240 h
135 days, 37% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 165.6 kg/nm · median 128.5 (+29%)
76.1Ranks 1,347 of 1,665, lowest first190.8
Average speedThis ship 13.0 kn · median 10.7 (+21%)
8.0Faster than 99% of oil tanker ships12.1
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.44 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+6%)
4.51Ranks 911 of 1,665, lowest first27.66
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU48%
  • Into the EU47%
  • At berth in the EU5%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (11,519 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
5.5%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.4 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • SIGRUN
  • Oil tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • SIGRUN
  • Oil tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • SIGRUN
  • Oil tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025+1.2 kn−1%+9%+7%−83%1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024+1.7 kn−6%+10%+259%+896%1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2023−1.4 kn−1%−13%−14%−5%1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021−0.5 kn+17%+11%−61%−31%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2020+4.5 kn−9%+46%+203%+75%4.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025VLKR Ship Management L.L.C6,99721,84142,2503,24013.0165.68.44–
2024VLKR Ship Management L.L.C6,59720,59939,3623,34311.8167.649.11–
2023not published1,9466,08610,9651,08810.1177.44.93–
2021not published2,2747,14712,7171,10911.5178.95.21–
2020not published4,98915,75932,6172,70812.0152.97.54–
2018not published1,8135,66310,7601,4347.5168.54.30–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025VLKR Ship Management L.L.C8.447.95+6%911 of 1,665ClassNKA+B+C
2024VLKR Ship Management L.L.C49.118.06+509%1,733 of 1,787ClassNKC
2023not published4.938.44−42%214 of 1,797Lloyd's RegisterA
2021not published5.218.86−41%263 of 1,789Lloyd's RegisterA
2020not published7.549.03−17%688 of 1,870Lloyd's RegisterA
2018not published4.308.86−51%181 of 1,779Lloyd's RegisterA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

SIGRUN (IMO 9612052): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze