Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

ULTRAMED

IMO: 9614347
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 10,731 t
Port of registry: Bridgetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.72 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: STELLAR BALTIC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DALCO SHIPPING DENIZCILIK SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,731 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

77.7 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−6%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

22.93

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+191%)

Average speed

1.9 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−82%)

Fuel per day at sea

3.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

176 t

CO₂ emitted

557 t

566 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

2,266 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,192 h

50 days, 14% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 77.7 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−6%)

61.0Ranks 1,437 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 1.9 kn · median 10.7 (−82%)

8.8Faster than 0% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 22.93 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+191%)

4.80Ranks 3,422 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU61%
Into the EU32%
At berth in the EU7%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (299 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

7.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ULTRAMED
Bulk carrier median

50.075.0100.0125.0150.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ULTRAMED
Bulk carrier median

0.05.010.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ULTRAMED
Bulk carrier median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.2 kn	−44%	+59%	+341%	−66%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 44%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2024	−10.8 kn	+131%	−87%	−98%	+301%	10.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 131%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.5 kn	−5%	+9%	+44%	+6%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	+16%	+20%	−2%	+41%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	−6%	−9%	−30%	−28%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.9 kn	−2%	−10%	−6%	−8%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	DALCO SHIPPING DENIZCILIK SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI	176	557	2,266	1,192	1.9	77.7	22.93	–
2024	DALCO SHIPPING DENIZCILIK SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI	72	229	514	790	0.7	139.7	68.00	–
2022	not published	1,993	6,316	33,002	2,881	11.5	60.4	16.96	–
2021	not published	1,450	4,526	22,901	2,292	10.0	63.3	16.00	–
2020	not published	1,273	3,990	23,272	2,412	9.6	54.7	11.37	–
2019	not published	1,929	6,036	33,265	3,322	10.0	58.0	15.80	–
2018	not published	2,098	6,574	35,429	3,260	10.9	59.2	17.19	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	DALCO SHIPPING DENIZCILIK SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI	22.93	7.89	+191%	3,422 of 3,610	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2024	DALCO SHIPPING DENIZCILIK SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI	68.00	8.09	+741%	3,083 of 3,089	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	16.96	8.71	+95%	3,567 of 3,968	Verifavia	B
2021	not published	16.00	8.57	+87%	3,158 of 3,466	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	11.37	8.24	+38%	2,473 of 3,150	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	15.80	8.38	+89%	3,051 of 3,360	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	17.19	8.50	+102%	3,096 of 3,384	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.