Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC ANTIGUA

IMO: 9619476
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 52,320 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.90 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: WOODLAND HILL LIMITED

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 64,377 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

296

Container median 182 kg/nm (+63%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−29%)

Average speed

16.0 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

113.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

18,789 t

CO₂ emitted

58,643 t

Distance sailed

63,435 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,971 h

165 days, 45% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 267 kg/nm · median 177 (+51%)

78.8Ranks 1,784 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 13.3 (+11%)

9.1Faster than 72% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−3%)

7.22Ranks 1,082 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports32%
From the EU31%
Into the EU34%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,665 t

2.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC ANTIGUA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC ANTIGUA
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC ANTIGUA
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	+0.4 kn	+12%	+15%	+70%	−12%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−3.3 kn	−22%	−37%	−16%	+20%	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.9 kn	−7%	−1%	−4%	+10%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	−3%	−8%	+79%	−8%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.1 kn	+13%	+29%	−60%	−10%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.5 kn	−0%	−3%	+4%	+16%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	WOODLAND HILL LIMITED	14,615	45,522	54,064	3,622	14.9	270	15.5	–
2025	MANDAI PARK SHIPPING PTE. LTD.	17,444	54,331	65,353	4,458	14.7	267	15.9	–
2023	not published	9,120	28,412	38,418	2,689	14.3	237	18.1	–
2022	not published	13,887	43,315	45,800	2,595	17.6	303	15.1	–
2021	not published	15,420	48,185	47,491	2,846	16.7	325	13.7	–
2020	not published	8,894	28,067	26,513	1,506	17.6	336	15.0	–
2019	not published	19,536	60,964	66,062	4,272	15.5	296	16.7	–
2018	not published	18,789	58,643	63,435	3,971	16.0	296	14.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	WOODLAND HILL LIMITED	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2025	MANDAI PARK SHIPPING PTE. LTD.	15.9	16.3	−3%	1,082 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	18.1	19.4	−7%	877 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	15.1	19.1	−21%	710 of 1,825	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	13.7	17.9	−23%	611 of 1,781	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	15.0	17.6	−15%	735 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	16.7	18.9	−12%	763 of 1,788	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	14.4	20.2	−29%	510 of 1,705	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.