Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

LILA CASABLANCA

IMO: 9621039
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 23,619 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEDI 5.29 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MARINE PRINCE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Kyra Global Marine Services

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 23,619 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

64.9 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 84.6 kg/nm (−23%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.71

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.09 (+8%)

Average speed

10.9 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.6 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

621 t

CO₂ emitted

1,970 t

2,001 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

9,577 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

876 h

37 days, 10% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 64.9 kg/nm · median 84.6 (−23%)

61.8Ranks 429 of 3,089, lowest first119.4

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 10.6 (+3%)

8.8Faster than 63% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.71 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+8%)

4.85Ranks 1,770 of 3,089, lowest first15.76

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports37%
From the EU39%
Into the EU12%
At berth in the EU12%

74% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,460 t).

Fuel burned laden

67%

33% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

11.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

LILA CASABLANCA
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

LILA CASABLANCA
Bulk carrier median

10.010.511.011.512.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LILA CASABLANCA
Bulk carrier median

0.050.0100150

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	−18%	−24%	−25%	−93%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2023	+1.0 kn	−1%	+8%	+180%	+1,358%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+9%	+7%	−81%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.7 kn	+2%	−4%	+157%	−14%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.6 kn	−5%	+9%	−72%	+10%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	Kyra Global Marine Services	621	1,970	9,577	876	10.9	64.9	8.71	67%
2023	not published	1,013	3,201	12,749	1,085	11.8	79.5	123.62	5%
2021	not published	365	1,154	4,548	420	10.8	80.2	8.48	86%
2020	not published	1,796	5,675	24,399	2,207	11.1	73.6	8.66	89%
2019	not published	682	2,132	9,478	806	11.8	72.0	10.07	65%
2018	not published	2,571	8,062	33,813	3,321	10.2	76.0	9.15	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	Kyra Global Marine Services	8.71	8.09	+8%	1,770 of 3,089	ABS	A
2023	not published	123.62	8.27	+1,395%	3,544 of 3,548	ABS	A
2021	not published	8.48	8.57	−1%	1,684 of 3,466	ClassNK	A+B
2020	not published	8.66	8.24	+5%	1,733 of 3,150	ClassNK	A
2019	not published	10.07	8.38	+20%	2,265 of 3,360	ClassNK	A+B
2018	not published	9.15	8.50	+8%	1,929 of 3,384	ClassNK	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.