Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

WHITE WANDERER

IMO: 9621869
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 21,031 t
Port of registry: Hong Kong, China
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.04 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC
Former names: VIDEN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Cachalot Denizcilik Ticaret AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 21,031 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

74.2 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−10%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.23

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+42%)

Average speed

11.3 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

20.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,328 t

CO₂ emitted

4,230 t

4,295 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

17,909 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,585 h

66 days, 18% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 74.2 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−10%)

61.0Ranks 1,144 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 10.7 (+6%)

8.8Faster than 77% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.23 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+42%)

4.80Ranks 2,823 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU26%
Into the EU69%
At berth in the EU5%

27% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,142 t).

Fuel burned laden

63%

37% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

5.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

WHITE WANDERER
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

WHITE WANDERER
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

WHITE WANDERER
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	+0%	+4%	+70%	−46%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	+16%	+18%	−57%	+199%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.0 kn	−14%	−4%	+99%	−32%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.1 kn	−11%	+0%	−47%	−12%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+2.3 kn	−5%	+30%	+4%	−7%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−3.9 kn	+9%	−33%	−46%	–	3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.9 kn	+3%	−5%	−32%	–	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Cachalot Denizcilik Ticaret AS	662	2,099	9,462	831	11.4	69.9	9.37	84%
2025	CACHALOT TECHNICAL SHIP MANAGEMENT FZCO	1,328	4,230	17,909	1,585	11.3	74.2	11.23	63%
2024	Cachalot Denizcilik Ticaret AS	780	2,460	10,517	966	10.9	74.2	20.94	–
2023	not published	1,578	4,982	24,614	2,313	10.6	64.1	7.01	–
2022	not published	921	2,928	12,369	1,290	9.6	74.5	10.32	–
2021	not published	1,965	6,299	23,497	2,759	8.5	83.6	11.74	–
2020	not published	1,997	6,401	22,655	3,637	6.2	88.1	12.57	–
2019	not published	3,387	10,654	41,960	4,138	10.1	80.7	0.63	–
2018	not published	4,824	15,207	61,838	5,618	11.0	78.0	0.50	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Cachalot Denizcilik Ticaret AS	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	A
2025	CACHALOT TECHNICAL SHIP MANAGEMENT FZCO	11.23	7.89	+42%	2,823 of 3,610	Verifavia	A
2024	Cachalot Denizcilik Ticaret AS	20.94	8.09	+159%	2,947 of 3,089	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	7.01	8.27	−15%	1,192 of 3,548	DNV	B
2022	not published	10.32	8.71	+18%	2,579 of 3,968	DNV	B
2021	not published	11.74	8.57	+37%	2,714 of 3,466	RINA	B
2020	not published	12.57	8.24	+53%	2,646 of 3,150	RINA	B
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	RINA	B
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.