Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

HOEGH GANDRIA

IMO: 9624914
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.82 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel: Mostly LNG
Former names: GOLAR SEAL

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

230.7 kg/nm

LNG carrier median 230.7 kg/nm (+0%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

9.10

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (+0%)

Average speed

11.9 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (−16%)

Fuel per day at sea

66.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,568 t

CO₂ emitted

18,658 t

Distance sailed

28,471 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,389 h

100 days, 27% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 230.7 kg/nm · median 230.7 (+0%)

166.5Ranks 178 of 355, lowest first358.9

Average speedThis ship 11.9 kn · median 14.2 (−16%)

10.7Faster than 21% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 9.10 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (+0%)

5.47Ranks 178 of 355, lowest first17.94

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports25%
From the EU28%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

HOEGH GANDRIA
LNG carrier median

220.0240.0260.0280.0300.0320.0

’192019’202020’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

HOEGH GANDRIA
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’192019’202020’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

HOEGH GANDRIA
LNG carrier median

0.050.0100150

’192019’202020’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2022→2023	−3.4 kn	−15%	−33%	−69%	−9%	3.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2022	−1.4 kn	+12%	+3%	+266%	+1%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	−17%	−12%	+350%	−93%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2023LNG	not published	6,568	18,658	28,471	2,389	11.9	230.7	–	–
2022LNG	not published	25,013	72,674	92,648	6,072	15.3	270.0	–	–
2020LNG	not published	6,090	17,195	25,346	1,518	16.7	240.3	–	–
2019LNG	not published	1,628	4,476	5,634	355	15.9	288.9	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023LNG	not published	9.10	9.10	+0%	178 of 355	DNV	B+C
2022LNG	not published	10.05	10.38	−3%	183 of 379	DNV	A+C
2020LNG	not published	9.95	10.71	−7%	119 of 267	DNV	C
2019LNG	not published	143.71	10.87	+1,222%	248 of 248	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.