Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

WILPRIDE

IMO: 9627966
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.94 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Awilco LNG Technical Mgmt AS

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

292

LNG carrier median 297 kg/nm (−2%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

9.39

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.7 (−12%)

Average speed

15.4 kn

LNG carrier median 14.7 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

108.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,664 t

CO₂ emitted

21,117 t

Distance sailed

26,262 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,702 h

71 days, 19% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 210 kg/nm · median 190 (+10%)

152Ranks 247 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 15.9 kn · median 14.4 (+10%)

11.2Faster than 90% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 8.01 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+13%)

5.06Ranks 230 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU26%
Into the EU59%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

439 t

2.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

WILPRIDE
LNG carrier median

100.0200.0300.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

WILPRIDE
LNG carrier median

5.07.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

WILPRIDE
LNG carrier median

6.07.08.09.010.011.0

’192019’202020’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	−4%	−2%	+78%	+10%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2024	−0.2 kn	−45%	−45%	+376%	−16%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 45%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2022	+0.3 kn	+35%	+37%	−48%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 35%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.6 kn	+12%	+45%	−20%	+37%	3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+4.6 kn	−13%	+43%	−11%	–	4.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Awilco LNG Technical Mgmt AS	24,329	65,273	116,148	7,322	15.9	210	–	–
2024LNG	Awilco LNG Technical Mgmt AS	14,218	38,160	65,232	4,204	15.5	218	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	5,406	14,892	13,714	873	15.7	394	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	7,664	21,117	26,262	1,702	15.4	292	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	8,646	24,389	33,032	2,789	11.8	262	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	11,098	31,998	37,034	5,122	7.2	300	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Awilco LNG Technical Mgmt AS	8.01	7.12	+13%	230 of 386	DNV	B+C
2024LNG	Awilco LNG Technical Mgmt AS	7.26	7.39	−2%	153 of 312	DNV	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	8.66	10.4	−17%	147 of 379	DNV	B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	9.39	10.7	−12%	95 of 267	DNV	B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	6.87	10.9	−37%	34 of 248	DNV	B+C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.