Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

EVER LUCID

IMO
9629055
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
52,712 t
Port of registry
Keelung
Technical efficiency
EIV 19.32 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 52,712 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
324.1 kg/nm
Container median 165.1 kg/nm (+96%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
19.29
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.40 (−1%)
Average speed
19.0 kn
Container median 13.2 kn (+44%)
Fuel per day at sea
148.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
869 t
CO₂ emitted
2,726 t
Distance sailed
2,681 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
141 h
6 days, 2% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,899 container ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 324.1 kg/nm · median 165.1 (+96%)
77.6Ranks 1,817 of 1,899, lowest first290.9
Average speedThis ship 19.0 kn · median 13.2 (+44%)
10.0Faster than 100% of container ships15.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 19.29 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.40 (−1%)
7.34Ranks 942 of 1,899, lowest first51.88
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports14%
  • From the EU35%
  • Into the EU43%
  • At berth in the EU9%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
8.9%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • EVER LUCID
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • EVER LUCID
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • EVER LUCID
  • Container median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2021→2023+2.3 kn+43%+63%−50%+13%2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 43%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2023not published8692,7262,68114119.0324.119.29–
2021not published1,2243,8595,39132216.7227.017.09–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2023not published19.2919.40−1%942 of 1,899ClassNKA+C
2021not published17.0917.90−5%846 of 1,781ABSA+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

EVER LUCID (IMO 9629055): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2021–2023 | Navalyze