Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

GREAT MIND

IMO: 9629627
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 28,801 t
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.63 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Hong Kong Ming Wah Ship Management Company Limited

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 28,801 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

95.4 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 84.6 kg/nm (+13%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.33

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.09 (+28%)

Average speed

10.9 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.6 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

965 t

CO₂ emitted

3,012 t

3,060 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

10,125 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

928 h

39 days, 11% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 95.4 kg/nm · median 84.6 (+13%)

61.8Ranks 2,172 of 3,089, lowest first119.4

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 10.6 (+3%)

8.8Faster than 61% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.33 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+28%)

4.85Ranks 2,215 of 3,089, lowest first15.76

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU43%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU5%

60% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,798 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

GREAT MIND
Bulk carrier median

80.085.090.095.0100.0105.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

Average speed, kn

GREAT MIND
Bulk carrier median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GREAT MIND
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2022→2024	−0.8 kn	+8%	+1%	−25%	+57%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	−14%	−12%	+44%	−39%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	+0%	−4%	−17%	−21%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.9 kn	+6%	+26%	−46%	+89%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+2.0 kn	−5%	+18%	+40%	−4%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	Hong Kong Ming Wah Ship Management Company Limited	965	3,012	10,125	928	10.9	95.4	10.33	–
2022	not published	1,198	3,740	13,548	1,160	11.7	88.4	6.58	–
2021	not published	967	3,026	9,427	824	11.4	102.5	10.86	–
2020	not published	1,159	3,620	11,355	944	12.0	102.1	13.69	–
2019	not published	2,043	6,369	21,185	2,093	10.1	96.5	7.24	–
2018	not published	1,541	4,812	15,121	1,868	8.1	101.9	7.54	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	Hong Kong Ming Wah Ship Management Company Limited	10.33	8.09	+28%	2,215 of 3,089	DNV	C
2022	not published	6.58	8.71	−24%	972 of 3,968	DNV	C
2021	not published	10.86	8.57	+27%	2,509 of 3,466	DNV	C
2020	not published	13.69	8.24	+66%	2,763 of 3,150	DNV	C
2019	not published	7.24	8.38	−14%	1,203 of 3,360	DNV	C
2018	not published	7.54	8.50	−11%	1,289 of 3,384	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.