Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

VELIKIY NOVGOROD

IMO: 9630004
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Libreville
Technical efficiency: EIV 5.69 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC
Fuel (estimated): LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

290

LNG carrier median 297 kg/nm (−2%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

31.1

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.7 (+191%)

Average speed

14.1 kn

LNG carrier median 14.7 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

97.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

21,745 t

CO₂ emitted

60,000 t

Distance sailed

75,041 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,335 h

222 days, 61% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 162 kg/nm · median 231 (−30%)

167Ranks 26 of 355, lowest first359

Average speedThis ship 11.7 kn · median 14.2 (−18%)

10.7Faster than 18% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 5.37 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (−41%)

5.47Ranks 31 of 355, lowest first17.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU33%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5,334 t

8.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

VELIKIY NOVGOROD
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

VELIKIY NOVGOROD
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

VELIKIY NOVGOROD
LNG carrier median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	−2.2 kn	−36%	−47%	+90%	−93%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 36%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.4 kn	+3%	−17%	−42%	+222%	3.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+3.2 kn	−15%	+5%	−88%	−19%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.1 kn	+2%	−11%	+120%	−36%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023LNG / alt.	not published	1,578	4,360	9,745	836	11.7	162	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	1,303	3,596	5,137	369	13.9	254	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	2,181	6,019	8,821	511	17.3	247	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	21,745	60,000	75,041	5,335	14.1	290	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	9,720	27,104	34,172	2,110	16.2	284	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023LNG / alt.	not published	5.37	9.10	−41%	31 of 355	Indian Register of Shipping	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	80.7	10.4	+677%	369 of 379	Indian Register of Shipping	B+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	25.1	10.5	+140%	268 of 289	Indian Register of Shipping	B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	31.1	10.7	+191%	262 of 267	ABS	B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	49.0	10.9	+350%	242 of 248	ABS	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.