Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

PSKOV

IMO: 9630028
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Libreville
Technical efficiency: EIV 5.71 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: PC2
Fuel (estimated): LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

355

LNG carrier median 323 kg/nm (+10%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

28.9

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (+164%)

Average speed

15.5 kn

LNG carrier median 13.7 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

132.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

21,565 t

CO₂ emitted

60,472 t

Distance sailed

60,757 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,916 h

163 days, 45% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 319 kg/nm · median 231 (+38%)

167Ranks 266 of 355, lowest first359

Average speedThis ship 14.0 kn · median 14.2 (−1%)

10.7Faster than 45% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 10.3 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (+13%)

5.47Ranks 210 of 355, lowest first17.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports18%
From the EU27%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU20%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

12,100 t

20.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PSKOV
LNG carrier median

200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

PSKOV
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

PSKOV
LNG carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	+2.1 kn	+21%	+43%	+236%	−34%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−4.0 kn	−10%	−32%	−47%	+5%	4.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.2 kn	+23%	+14%	−8%	+9%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+4.4 kn	−28%	−3%	−40%	−45%	4.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.8 kn	−8%	−24%	−6%	−15%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023LNG / alt.	not published	17,992	49,604	56,428	4,033	14.0	319	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	4,420	12,229	16,818	1,417	11.9	263	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	9,220	25,598	31,678	1,996	15.9	291	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	8,138	22,587	34,317	2,005	17.1	237	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	18,609	51,873	56,808	4,464	12.7	328	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	21,565	60,472	60,757	3,916	15.5	355	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023LNG / alt.	not published	10.3	9.10	+13%	210 of 355	Indian Register of Shipping	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	15.5	10.4	+50%	305 of 379	Indian Register of Shipping	B+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	14.9	10.5	+42%	229 of 289	Indian Register of Shipping	B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	13.7	10.7	+28%	198 of 267	ABS	B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	24.7	10.9	+127%	229 of 248	ABS	B+C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	28.9	10.9	+164%	189 of 197	ABS	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.