Navalyze

Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

WOOYANG CLES

IMO
9638147
Type
Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried
14,241 t
Port of registry
Jeju
Technical efficiency
EIV 5.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
CIELO DI MONACO

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Wooyang Shipping Co., Ltd

?
?

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 14,241 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
65.0 kg/nm
Bulk carrier median 84.6 kg/nm (−23%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
14.39
g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.09 (+78%)
Average speed
12.8 kn
Bulk carrier median 10.6 kn (+21%)
Fuel per day at sea
20.0 t/day
Fuel consumed
423 t
CO₂ emitted
1,335 t
1,356 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
6,515 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
508 h
21 days, 6% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 65.0 kg/nm · median 84.6 (−23%)
61.8Ranks 432 of 3,089, lowest first119.4
Average speedThis ship 12.8 kn · median 10.6 (+21%)
8.8Faster than 98% of bulk carrier ships11.8
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.39 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+78%)
4.85Ranks 2,712 of 3,089, lowest first15.76
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports3%
  • From the EU57%
  • Into the EU37%
  • At berth in the EU3%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (709 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
2.9%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • WOOYANG CLES
  • Bulk carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • WOOYANG CLES
  • Bulk carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • WOOYANG CLES
  • Bulk carrier median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2022→2024+2.2 kn−28%−13%−39%+26%2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−0.4 kn+24%+20%−63%+35%0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021−1.0 kn+7%−3%+33%−11%1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+3.8 kn−17%+22%−6%−7%3.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−0.8 kn+10%−1%+201%−9%0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2024Wooyang Shipping Co., Ltd4231,3356,51550812.865.014.39–
2022not published9623,04110,6651,00410.690.211.43–
2021not published2,0886,51728,6282,60811.072.98.48–
2020not published1,4744,64521,5491,79912.068.49.57–
2019not published1,9015,95223,0312,8198.282.510.28–
2018not published5751,8007,6438489.075.211.34–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmBulk carrier medianvs Bulk carrierRankVerifierMethods
2024Wooyang Shipping Co., Ltd14.398.09+78%2,712 of 3,089Korean RegisterA
2022not published11.438.71+31%2,885 of 3,968Korean RegisterA
2021not published8.488.57−1%1,684 of 3,466RINAB
2020not published9.578.24+16%2,048 of 3,150RINAB
2019not published10.288.38+23%2,325 of 3,360RINAB
2018not published11.348.50+33%2,562 of 3,384RINAB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.