Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

LOCH LOMOND

IMO: 9639464
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 12,469 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EIV 6.48 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MASUMOTO SHIPPING CO.,LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 12,469 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

69.6 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−16%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.56

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+123%)

Average speed

11.6 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (+8%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,578 t

CO₂ emitted

4,962 t

5,040 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

22,664 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,957 h

82 days, 22% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 69.6 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−16%)

61.0Ranks 838 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 11.6 kn · median 10.7 (+8%)

8.8Faster than 85% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.56 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+123%)

4.80Ranks 3,314 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU26%
Into the EU65%
At berth in the EU2%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,696 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

LOCH LOMOND
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LOCH LOMOND
Bulk carrier median

10.010.511.011.512.012.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LOCH LOMOND
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.6 kn	−2%	+4%	−45%	–	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	−5%	−11%	+48%	–	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	−17%	−14%	+160%	−30%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.9 kn	+4%	−3%	−17%	+15%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.1 kn	+12%	+23%	+39%	+27%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+1%	+1%	−39%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	+0.7 kn	−2%	+4%	−42%	−24%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MASUMOTO SHIPPING CO.,LTD.	1,578	4,962	22,664	1,957	11.6	69.6	17.56	–
2024	MASUMOTO SHIPPING CO.,LTD.	2,916	9,173	41,094	3,739	11.0	71.0	–	–
2023	not published	2,071	6,499	27,782	2,366	11.7	74.6	7.47	–
2022	not published	959	3,038	10,680	943	11.3	89.8	10.72	–
2021	not published	1,112	3,520	12,928	1,060	12.2	86.0	9.35	–
2020	not published	712	2,254	9,281	834	11.1	76.7	7.36	–
2019	not published	1,153	3,612	15,172	1,361	11.2	76.0	7.03	–
2018	not published	2,025	6,363	26,053	2,488	10.5	77.7	9.31	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MASUMOTO SHIPPING CO.,LTD.	17.56	7.89	+123%	3,314 of 3,610	ClassNK	B
2024	MASUMOTO SHIPPING CO.,LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	7.47	8.27	−10%	1,426 of 3,548	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	10.72	8.71	+23%	2,690 of 3,968	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	9.35	8.57	+9%	2,045 of 3,466	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	7.36	8.24	−11%	1,216 of 3,150	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	7.03	8.38	−16%	1,116 of 3,360	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	9.31	8.50	+10%	1,993 of 3,384	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.