Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

LUMPHINI PARK

IMO
9640114
Type
Chemical tanker
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EEXI 7.83 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
81.0 kg/nm
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
–
g CO₂/t·nm
Average speed
13.2 kn
Fuel per day at sea
25.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,054 t
CO₂ emitted
3,296 t
Distance sailed
13,020 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
988 h
41 days, 11% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2021

Set against all 1,343 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2021 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 82.2 kg/nm · median 83.0 (−1%)
56.3Ranks 651 of 1,343, lowest first114.0
Average speedThis ship 12.3 kn · median 11.2 (+10%)
8.9Faster than 83% of chemical tanker ships12.7
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 16.24 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.69 (−3%)
9.56Ranks 649 of 1,343, lowest first41.03
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports13%
  • From the EU39%
  • Into the EU42%
  • At berth in the EU5%
Fuel burned laden
82%
18% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
5.1%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • LUMPHINI PARK
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • LUMPHINI PARK
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • LUMPHINI PARK
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2021→2023+0.9 kn−1%+5%−39%–0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2021−0.1 kn−5%−5%+60%+287%Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2023not published1,0543,29613,02098813.281.0–82%
2021not published1,7625,52821,4351,74012.382.216.24–
2019not published1,1513,60513,3691,07812.486.14.20–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2023not published––––ABSC
2021not published16.2416.69−3%649 of 1,343DNVC
2019not published4.2017.32−76%5 of 1,321Lloyd's RegisterC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

LUMPHINI PARK (IMO 9640114): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2019–2023 | Navalyze