Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

HOEGH GALLANT

IMO: 9653678
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Oslo
Technical efficiency: EIV 5.47 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel: Mostly LNG

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

282.2 kg/nm

LNG carrier median 256.6 kg/nm (+10%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

9.98

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.46 (−5%)

Average speed

13.1 kn

LNG carrier median 14.6 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

89.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,659 t

CO₂ emitted

7,326 t

Distance sailed

9,425 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

717 h

30 days, 8% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2021

Set against all 289 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2021 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 282.2 kg/nm · median 256.6 (+10%)

170.7Ranks 171 of 289, lowest first378.2

Average speedThis ship 13.1 kn · median 14.6 (−10%)

11.4Faster than 25% of LNG carrier ships16.7

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 9.98 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 10.46 (−5%)

5.77Ranks 136 of 289, lowest first20.28

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU48%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

HOEGH GALLANT
LNG carrier median

250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021

Average speed, kn

HOEGH GALLANT
LNG carrier median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

HOEGH GALLANT
LNG carrier median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2020→2021	−0.8 kn	−18%	−23%	−27%	−27%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.7 kn	+22%	+29%	−83%	+46%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+2.5 kn	−26%	−8%	+470%	−33%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2021LNG	not published	2,659	7,326	9,425	717	13.1	282.2	–	–
2020LNG	not published	4,447	12,263	12,845	922	13.9	346.2	–	–
2019LNG	not published	21,770	60,303	76,458	5,800	13.2	284.7	–	–
2018LNG	not published	5,146	14,170	13,417	1,255	10.7	383.5	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2021LNG	not published	9.98	10.46	−5%	136 of 289	DNV	A+C
2020LNG	not published	13.69	10.71	+28%	199 of 267	DNV	A+C
2019LNG	not published	9.35	10.87	−14%	76 of 248	DNV	A+C
2018LNG	not published	13.98	10.92	+28%	153 of 197	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.