Navalyze

Navalyze · Other · Ship

CERULEAN

IMO
9655169
Type
Other ship types
Port of registry
Singapore
Technical efficiency
EIV 13.72 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Skeiron Logistics Pte Ltd

?

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
97.4 kg/nm
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
–
g CO₂/t·nm
Average speed
8.3 kn
Fuel per day at sea
19.5 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,677 t
CO₂ emitted
8,470 t
8,601 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
27,490 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,298 h
137 days, 38% of the year

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports9%
  • From the EU59%
  • Into the EU29%
  • At berth in the EU2%

56% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,715 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
2.4%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.1 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.015
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Other median is the middle ship of all other ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • CERULEAN
  • Other median

Average speed, kn

  • CERULEAN
  • Other median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2023→2024−0.4 kn+15%+10%+103%–0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2023+0.3 kn+23%+27%−45%–Same speed, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020−0.7 kn−10%−17%−2%–0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019−0.4 kn−3%−7%+329%–0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2024Skeiron Logistics Pte Ltd2,6778,47027,4903,2988.397.4––
2023not published1,1483,64213,5281,5558.784.9––
2020not published1,7005,37824,6342,9458.469.0––
2019not published1,9306,05725,2102,7769.176.6––
2018not published4621,4435,8706159.578.7––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOther medianvs OtherRankVerifierMethods
2024Skeiron Logistics Pte Ltd––––Korean RegisterA
2023not published––––Korean RegisterA
2020not published––––Korean RegisterA
2019not published––––VerifaviaA
2018not published––––VerifaviaA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Other ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's other ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

CERULEAN (IMO 9655169): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2024 | Navalyze