Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

ESSHU MARU

IMO: 9666560
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EIV 9.17 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel: Mostly LNG

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

255.4 kg/nm

LNG carrier median 323.0 kg/nm (−21%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

11.40

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.92 (+4%)

Average speed

17.2 kn

LNG carrier median 13.7 kn (+26%)

Fuel per day at sea

105.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,234 t

CO₂ emitted

6,513 t

Distance sailed

8,750 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

508 h

21 days, 6% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2018

Set against all 197 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2018 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 255.4 kg/nm · median 323.0 (−21%)

221.4Ranks 44 of 197, lowest first437.2

Average speedThis ship 17.2 kn · median 13.7 (+26%)

10.0Faster than 97% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 11.40 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 10.92 (+4%)

5.83Ranks 116 of 197, lowest first18.65

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU48%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

0.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2018LNG	not published	2,234	6,513	8,750	508	17.2	255.4	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2018LNG	not published	11.40	10.92	+4%	116 of 197	ClassNK	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.