Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

LNG JUROJIN

IMO: 9666998
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EIV 9.17 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel: Mostly LNG

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

268.7 kg/nm

LNG carrier median 296.8 kg/nm (−9%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

9.86

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.71 (−8%)

Average speed

15.0 kn

LNG carrier median 14.7 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

96.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,902 t

CO₂ emitted

49,306 t

Distance sailed

66,634 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,440 h

185 days, 51% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2020

Set against all 267 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 268.7 kg/nm · median 296.8 (−9%)

201.8Ranks 106 of 267, lowest first396.9

Average speedThis ship 15.0 kn · median 14.7 (+2%)

11.8Faster than 56% of LNG carrier ships16.7

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 9.86 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 10.71 (−8%)

6.68Ranks 115 of 267, lowest first18.58

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU40%
Into the EU52%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

LNG JUROJIN
LNG carrier median

260.0280.0300.0320.0340.0

’182018’192019’202020

Average speed, kn

LNG JUROJIN
LNG carrier median

12.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

LNG JUROJIN
LNG carrier median

9.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2019→2020	+1.5 kn	+2%	+13%	+63%	+5%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.3 kn	−2%	+8%	−8%	−20%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2020LNG	not published	17,902	49,306	66,634	4,440	15.0	268.7	–	–
2019LNG	not published	10,745	29,779	40,862	3,023	13.5	263.0	–	–
2018LNG	not published	11,970	33,976	44,551	3,649	12.2	268.7	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2020LNG	not published	9.86	10.71	−8%	115 of 267	ClassNK	B+C
2019LNG	not published	9.41	10.87	−13%	77 of 248	ClassNK	B+C
2018LNG	not published	11.82	10.92	+8%	121 of 197	ClassNK	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.