Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

VIKING ADVENTURE

IMO: 9673018
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 7,517 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.86 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Gram Car Carriers Shipowning 3 AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,517 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

112.4 kg/nm

Vehicle carrier median 99.9 kg/nm (+13%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

46.70

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 55.36 (−16%)

Average speed

15.8 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

42.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,578 t

CO₂ emitted

4,928 t

5,006 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

14,039 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

890 h

37 days, 10% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 112.4 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+13%)

79.6Ranks 419 of 506, lowest first119.0

Average speedThis ship 15.8 kn · median 14.4 (+10%)

12.0Faster than 86% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 46.70 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.36 (−16%)

34.70Ranks 176 of 506, lowest first158.48

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU94%
Into the EU3%
At berth in the EU1%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,534 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

VIKING ADVENTURE
Vehicle carrier median

90.0100.0110.0120.0130.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VIKING ADVENTURE
Vehicle carrier median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

VIKING ADVENTURE
Vehicle carrier median

0.050.0100150200250

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.3 kn	+8%	+18%	−55%	+4%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+3.4 kn	−18%	+7%	+4,618%	−79%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−4.8 kn	+24%	−13%	−99%	+381%	4.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2022	+1.3 kn	−0%	+8%	+331%	−9%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	+1%	+3%	−70%	−29%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	−4%	−11%	+74%	+40%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Gram Car Carriers Shipowning 3 AS	1,578	4,928	14,039	890	15.8	112.4	46.70	–
2024part-year	Gram Car Carriers Shipowning 3 AS	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024part-year	Gram Car Carriers Shipowning 3 AS	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024	Gram Car Carriers Shipowning 3 AS	3,217	10,048	31,045	2,146	14.5	103.6	44.69	–
2023	not published	83	266	658	59	11.1	126.4	211.72	–
2022	not published	5,659	17,774	55,461	3,496	15.9	102.0	44.00	–
2020	not published	1,314	4,115	12,855	878	14.6	102.2	48.24	–
2019	not published	4,340	13,610	42,874	2,980	14.4	101.2	67.86	–
2018	not published	2,598	8,127	24,674	1,587	15.5	105.3	48.37	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Gram Car Carriers Shipowning 3 AS	46.70	55.36	−16%	176 of 506	DNV	B+C
2024part-year	Gram Car Carriers Shipowning 3 AS	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2024part-year	Gram Car Carriers Shipowning 3 AS	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2024	Gram Car Carriers Shipowning 3 AS	44.69	55.31	−19%	88 of 335	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	211.72	56.64	+274%	403 of 417	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	44.00	57.66	−24%	88 of 463	DNV	C
2020	not published	48.24	57.26	−16%	131 of 449	Verifavia	C
2019	not published	67.86	58.95	+15%	280 of 426	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	48.37	62.35	−22%	62 of 434	Verifavia	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.