Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

WL UGLICH

IMO: 9674373
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 21,263 t
Port of registry: Hong Kong, China
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.05 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC
Former names: POLA UGLICH

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Cachalot Denizcilik Ticaret AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 21,263 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

62.3 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−25%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.30

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+18%)

Average speed

12.9 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (+21%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,151 t

CO₂ emitted

3,655 t

3,711 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

18,481 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,430 h

60 days, 16% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 62.3 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−25%)

61.0Ranks 433 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 12.9 kn · median 10.7 (+21%)

8.8Faster than 99% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.30 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+18%)

4.80Ranks 2,383 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU26%
Into the EU58%
At berth in the EU5%

19% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (710 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

WL UGLICH
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

WL UGLICH
Bulk carrier median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

WL UGLICH
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+4.7 kn	−29%	+11%	+104%	−29%	4.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 29%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.8 kn	+39%	+15%	+216%	−7%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 39%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	−12%	−17%	+8%	+26%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	+4%	−6%	−88%	+57%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+5%	+8%	−34%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+1.7 kn	−14%	+2%	+592%	−17%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.3 kn	+6%	−14%	−80%	+20%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Cachalot Denizcilik Ticaret AS	737	2,340	11,985	909	13.2	61.5	8.86	–
2025	CACHALOT TECHNICAL SHIP MANAGEMENT FZCO	1,151	3,655	18,481	1,430	12.9	62.3	9.30	–
2024	Cachalot Denizcilik Ticaret AS	797	2,502	9,077	1,101	8.2	87.8	13.18	–
2023	not published	181	582	2,876	289	10.0	63.1	14.23	–
2022	not published	189	607	2,651	250	10.6	71.5	11.25	–
2021	not published	1,563	4,919	22,810	1,942	11.7	68.5	7.17	–
2020	not published	2,263	7,161	34,734	3,054	11.4	65.2	7.83	–
2019	not published	378	1,193	5,016	519	9.7	75.4	9.48	–
2018	not published	1,745	5,473	24,533	2,049	12.0	71.1	7.90	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Cachalot Denizcilik Ticaret AS	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	A
2025	CACHALOT TECHNICAL SHIP MANAGEMENT FZCO	9.30	7.89	+18%	2,383 of 3,610	Verifavia	A
2024	Cachalot Denizcilik Ticaret AS	13.18	8.09	+63%	2,619 of 3,089	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	14.23	8.27	+72%	3,034 of 3,548	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	11.25	8.71	+29%	2,849 of 3,968	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	7.17	8.57	−16%	1,078 of 3,466	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	7.83	8.24	−5%	1,395 of 3,150	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	9.48	8.38	+13%	2,097 of 3,360	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	7.90	8.50	−7%	1,455 of 3,384	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.