Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

HERBANIA

IMO: 9674828
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 2,981 t
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EIV 22.34 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Distribuidora Maritima Petrogas, S.L.U.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,981 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

57.0 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−28%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

61.06

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+306%)

Average speed

9.2 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−17%)

Fuel per day at sea

12.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,210 t

CO₂ emitted

7,060 t

7,169 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

38,789 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,220 h

176 days, 48% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 57.0 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−28%)

52.8Ranks 201 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 9.2 kn · median 11.1 (−17%)

8.8Faster than 14% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 61.06 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+306%)

7.93Ranks 1,419 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports69%
From the EU6%
Into the EU3%
At berth in the EU22%

95% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,739 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

21.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

HERBANIA
Chemical tanker median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HERBANIA
Chemical tanker median

9.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HERBANIA
Chemical tanker median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.8 kn	−4%	−19%	+15%	−9%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+15%	+21%	−13%	+34%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	+17%	+8%	−6%	+16%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	−7%	−6%	+15%	−17%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+4%	+5%	−12%	+20%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	−18%	−16%	+8%	−24%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	−3%	−11%	−4%	−10%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Distribuidora Maritima Petrogas, S.L.U.	2,210	7,060	38,789	4,220	9.2	57.0	61.06	–
2024	Distribuidora Maritima Petrogas, S.L.U.	1,999	6,279	33,792	3,084	11.0	59.2	67.10	–
2023	not published	1,992	6,239	38,804	3,702	10.5	51.3	49.90	–
2022	not published	1,801	5,689	41,152	3,627	11.3	43.8	43.06	–
2021	not published	1,677	5,297	35,631	3,198	11.1	47.1	52.12	–
2020	not published	1,826	5,770	40,500	3,640	11.1	45.1	43.44	–
2019	not published	2,052	6,434	37,440	3,435	10.9	54.8	57.25	–
2018	not published	2,208	6,938	38,937	3,315	11.7	56.7	63.27	1%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Distribuidora Maritima Petrogas, S.L.U.	61.06	15.04	+306%	1,419 of 1,460	Lloyd's Register	B
2024	Distribuidora Maritima Petrogas, S.L.U.	67.10	16.73	+301%	1,245 of 1,274	Lloyd's Register	B
2023	not published	49.90	16.23	+207%	1,233 of 1,314	Lloyd's Register	A+C
2022	not published	43.06	16.06	+168%	1,298 of 1,409	Korean Register	A+C
2021	not published	52.12	16.69	+212%	1,276 of 1,343	Korean Register	A+C
2020	not published	43.44	16.16	+169%	1,206 of 1,312	Korean Register	A+C
2019	not published	57.25	17.32	+231%	1,263 of 1,321	Korean Register	A+C
2018	not published	63.27	17.14	+269%	1,244 of 1,294	Korean Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.