Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

EAGLE BARENTS

IMO: 9676125
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 40,197 t
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Stavanger
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.88 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: AET SEA SHUTTLE AS · part of AET

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 50,081 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

377

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (+193%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

23.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.86 (+165%)

Average speed

7.5 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−30%)

Fuel per day at sea

67.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,794 t

CO₂ emitted

24,295 t

Distance sailed

20,688 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,770 h

115 days, 32% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 267 kg/nm · median 129 (+108%)

76.1Ranks 1,640 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 7.9 kn · median 10.7 (−26%)

8.0Faster than 10% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+161%)

4.51Ranks 1,412 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports72%
From the EU7%
Into the EU11%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,191 t

9.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EAGLE BARENTS
Oil tanker median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EAGLE BARENTS
Oil tanker median

2.04.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EAGLE BARENTS
Oil tanker median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	−25%	−21%	+13%	−40%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	+23%	+12%	−26%	+43%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.7 kn	−7%	+17%	+18%	−9%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.0 kn	−17%	−28%	+28%	+14%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.8 kn	−14%	−31%	+45%	+3%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+5.5 kn	+36%	+230%	−50%	−17%	5.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 36%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	+10%	−5%	−8%	+31%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	AET SEA SHUTTLE AS	6,917	21,626	25,928	3,265	7.9	267	20.8	–
2024	AET SEA SHUTTLE AS	8,169	25,483	22,963	3,062	7.5	356	34.7	–
2023	not published	9,014	28,136	31,186	3,799	8.2	289	24.3	–
2022	not published	8,249	25,725	26,420	4,060	6.5	312	26.7	–
2021	not published	7,794	24,295	20,688	2,770	7.5	377	23.5	–
2020	not published	6,233	19,422	14,221	1,537	9.3	438	22.8	–
2019	not published	9,227	28,771	28,696	7,495	3.8	322	27.6	–
2018	not published	9,107	28,393	31,136	7,023	4.4	293	21.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	AET SEA SHUTTLE AS	20.8	7.95	+161%	1,412 of 1,665	DNV	B+C
2024	AET SEA SHUTTLE AS	34.7	8.06	+331%	1,680 of 1,787	DNV	C
2023	not published	24.3	8.44	+187%	1,607 of 1,797	DNV	C
2022	not published	26.7	8.51	+213%	1,785 of 1,961	DNV	C
2021	not published	23.5	8.86	+165%	1,576 of 1,789	DNV	C
2020	not published	22.8	9.03	+153%	1,629 of 1,870	DNV	C
2019	not published	27.6	8.83	+212%	1,760 of 1,919	DNV	C
2018	not published	21.0	8.86	+137%	1,553 of 1,779	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.