Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

EAGLE BERGEN

IMO: 9676137
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 38,998 t
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.73 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: AET SEA SHUTTLE AS · part of AET

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 34,845 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

279

Oil tanker median 134 kg/nm (+108%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

25.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 9.03 (+177%)

Average speed

6.3 kn

Oil tanker median 11.0 kn (−43%)

Fuel per day at sea

42.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,216 t

CO₂ emitted

31,935 t

Distance sailed

36,600 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,773 h

241 days, 66% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 267 kg/nm · median 129 (+107%)

76.1Ranks 1,638 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 7.5 kn · median 10.7 (−30%)

8.0Faster than 7% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 21.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+169%)

4.51Ranks 1,424 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports85%
From the EU2%
Into the EU2%
At berth in the EU11%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3,551 t

11.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EAGLE BERGEN
Oil tanker median

100.0150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EAGLE BERGEN
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EAGLE BERGEN
Oil tanker median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.3 kn	+5%	−10%	−28%	+32%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	−2%	−2%	+26%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+2.2 kn	−3%	+31%	+29%	−27%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.2 kn	−12%	−34%	−16%	+31%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.5 kn	+8%	+49%	−16%	−31%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	+6%	+22%	−9%	+15%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	+10%	−8%	−1%	+10%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	AET SEA SHUTTLE AS	8,038	25,143	30,155	4,000	7.5	267	21.4	–
2024	AET SEA SHUTTLE AS	10,605	33,087	41,950	4,776	8.8	253	16.2	–
2023	not published	8,573	26,764	33,224	3,772	8.8	258	16.7	–
2022	not published	6,810	21,237	25,671	3,919	6.6	265	22.7	–
2021	not published	9,237	28,804	30,671	3,500	8.8	301	17.4	–
2020	not published	10,216	31,935	36,600	5,773	6.3	279	25.0	–
2019	not published	10,586	33,019	40,336	7,317	5.5	262	21.8	–
2018	not published	9,749	30,409	40,757	6,179	6.6	239	19.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	AET SEA SHUTTLE AS	21.4	7.95	+169%	1,424 of 1,665	DNV	B+C
2024	AET SEA SHUTTLE AS	16.2	8.06	+101%	1,453 of 1,787	DNV	C
2023	not published	16.7	8.44	+98%	1,463 of 1,797	DNV	C
2022	not published	22.7	8.51	+167%	1,735 of 1,961	DNV	C
2021	not published	17.4	8.86	+96%	1,458 of 1,789	DNV	C
2020	not published	25.0	9.03	+177%	1,661 of 1,870	DNV	C
2019	not published	21.8	8.83	+147%	1,670 of 1,919	DNV	C
2018	not published	19.8	8.86	+124%	1,532 of 1,779	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.