Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

GASLOG GLASGOW

IMO: 9687021
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.76 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel: Mostly LNG

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

211.4 kg/nm

LNG carrier median 230.7 kg/nm (−8%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

6.41

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (−30%)

Average speed

15.1 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

76.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,954 t

CO₂ emitted

41,383 t

Distance sailed

70,719 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,697 h

196 days, 54% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 211.4 kg/nm · median 230.7 (−8%)

166.5Ranks 145 of 355, lowest first358.9

Average speedThis ship 15.1 kn · median 14.2 (+6%)

10.7Faster than 72% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 6.41 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (−30%)

5.47Ranks 80 of 355, lowest first17.94

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU48%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

GASLOG GLASGOW
LNG carrier median

200.0220.0240.0260.0

’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

GASLOG GLASGOW
LNG carrier median

14.014.314.514.815.015.3

’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

GASLOG GLASGOW
LNG carrier median

6.08.010.012.0

’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−1%	−2%	+32%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2023LNG	not published	14,954	41,383	70,719	4,697	15.1	211.4	–	–
2022LNG	not published	11,462	32,202	53,600	3,544	15.1	213.8	–	61%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023LNG	not published	6.41	9.10	−30%	80 of 355	ABS	B+C
2022LNG	not published	6.23	10.38	−40%	52 of 379	ABS	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.