Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

LNG FINIMA II

IMO: 9690145
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bermuda
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.37 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NLNG Ship Management Ltd

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

212

LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (−8%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

11.6

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (+28%)

Average speed

10.6 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (−25%)

Fuel per day at sea

53.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,374 t

CO₂ emitted

34,138 t

Distance sailed

58,258 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,513 h

230 days, 63% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 231 kg/nm · median 190 (+21%)

152Ranks 277 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 12.2 kn · median 14.4 (−15%)

11.2Faster than 15% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 9.15 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+29%)

5.06Ranks 267 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU62%
Into the EU34%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

416 t

1.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LNG FINIMA II
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LNG FINIMA II
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

LNG FINIMA II
LNG carrier median

0.05.010.015.0

’182018’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.7 kn	+7%	+24%	−26%	−32%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	+2%	+1%	−20%	+16%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−8%	−9%	−19%	+11%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.1 kn	+6%	−18%	+72%	+69%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.9 kn	+12%	+19%	+17%	–	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2020	−1.2 kn	−42%	−47%	−30%	–	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 42%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	NLNG Ship Management Ltd	8,040	21,516	34,880	2,849	12.2	231	–	44%
2024LNG	NLNG Ship Management Ltd	10,117	27,053	46,880	4,455	10.5	216	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	12,374	34,138	58,258	5,513	10.6	212	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	16,770	46,299	72,251	6,815	10.6	232	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	9,188	25,702	41,957	3,067	13.7	219	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	7,064	19,467	35,978	2,802	12.8	196	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	17,420	49,412	51,728	3,694	14.0	337	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	NLNG Ship Management Ltd	9.15	7.12	+29%	267 of 386	Lloyd's Register	C
2024LNG	NLNG Ship Management Ltd	13.5	7.39	+83%	265 of 312	Lloyd's Register	C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	11.6	9.10	+28%	257 of 355	Lloyd's Register	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	10.5	10.4	+1%	194 of 379	Lloyd's Register	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	6.22	10.5	−41%	43 of 289	Lloyd's Register	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	1.03	10.9	−91%	4 of 197	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.