Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

LNG ABUJA II

IMO: 9690169
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bermuda
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.03 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Bonny Gas Transport Ltd

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

488

LNG carrier median 308 kg/nm (+58%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

39.0

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (+258%)

Average speed

14.9 kn

LNG carrier median 13.5 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

174.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

30,180 t

CO₂ emitted

83,270 t

Distance sailed

61,912 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,155 h

173 days, 47% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 192 kg/nm · median 190 (+1%)

152Ranks 202 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 11.5 kn · median 14.4 (−20%)

11.2Faster than 11% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 7.32 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+3%)

5.06Ranks 202 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU46%
Into the EU52%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,015 t

2.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LNG ABUJA II
LNG carrier median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LNG ABUJA II
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

LNG ABUJA II
LNG carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	−0%	−2%	+231%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2024	−1.6 kn	−3%	−14%	−58%	−7%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	+8%	+5%	+33%	+15%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−2.7 kn	−17%	−31%	+152%	−23%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.3 kn	−55%	−51%	−78%	−77%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 55%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.6 kn	+115%	+140%	+18%	+346%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 115%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Bonny Gas Transport Ltd	12,024	32,163	62,733	5,464	11.5	192	–	–
2024LNG	Bonny Gas Transport Ltd	3,648	9,776	18,962	1,624	11.7	192	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	9,021	25,714	45,550	3,435	13.3	198	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	6,312	17,405	34,308	2,533	13.5	184	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	3,014	8,310	13,593	839	16.2	222	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	30,180	83,270	61,912	4,155	14.9	488	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	11,837	32,688	52,269	3,918	13.3	227	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Bonny Gas Transport Ltd	7.32	7.12	+3%	202 of 386	DNV	B+C
2024LNG	Bonny Gas Transport Ltd	7.28	7.39	−1%	154 of 312	DNV	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	7.87	10.4	−24%	125 of 379	DNV	B+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	6.86	10.5	−34%	62 of 289	DNV	B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	8.92	10.7	−17%	74 of 267	DNV	B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	39.0	10.9	+258%	238 of 248	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	8.73	10.9	−20%	46 of 197	Lloyd's Register	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.