Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

LNG ABALAMABIE

IMO: 9690171
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.03 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel: Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Bonny Gas Transport Ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

172.8 kg/nm

LNG carrier median 190.4 kg/nm (−9%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

11.92

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 7.12 (+67%)

Average speed

10.1 kn

LNG carrier median 14.4 kn (−30%)

Fuel per day at sea

41.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,449 t

CO₂ emitted

19,947 t

26,397 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

43,120 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,280 h

178 days, 49% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 172.8 kg/nm · median 190.4 (−9%)

152.1Ranks 113 of 386, lowest first319.4

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 14.4 (−30%)

11.2Faster than 6% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 11.92 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+67%)

5.06Ranks 325 of 386, lowest first16.14

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU73%
Into the EU26%
At berth in the EU1%

50% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (10,051 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

0.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

222.7 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.323

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

LNG ABALAMABIE
LNG carrier median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LNG ABALAMABIE
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

LNG ABALAMABIE
LNG carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.7 kn	−7%	−21%	+45%	+63%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.1 kn	−27%	−33%	+232%	+79%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	+40%	+44%	−85%	−43%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 40%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.7 kn	−20%	−34%	+40%	−8%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+3.4 kn	−6%	+21%	+7%	−14%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.8 kn	−46%	−37%	+37%	−73%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 46%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−4.0 kn	+112%	+52%	−13%	+310%	4.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 112%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Bonny Gas Transport Ltd	7,449	19,947	43,120	4,280	10.1	172.8	–	–
2024LNG	Bonny Gas Transport Ltd	5,537	14,822	29,699	2,520	11.8	186.4	–	–
2023LNG	not published	2,269	6,256	8,943	696	12.9	253.8	–	–
2022LNG	not published	10,952	30,952	60,583	4,854	12.5	180.8	–	–
2021LNG	not published	9,786	26,979	43,251	2,854	15.2	226.3	–	–
2020LNG	not published	9,711	26,770	40,528	3,430	11.8	239.6	–	–
2019LNG	not published	13,132	36,209	29,562	2,945	10.0	444.2	–	–
2018LNG	not published	7,128	19,642	34,076	2,438	14.0	209.2	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Bonny Gas Transport Ltd	11.92	7.12	+67%	325 of 386	DNV	B+C
2024LNG	Bonny Gas Transport Ltd	7.33	7.39	−1%	155 of 312	DNV	B+C
2023LNG	not published	4.10	9.10	−55%	9 of 355	DNV	B+C
2022LNG	not published	7.14	10.38	−31%	92 of 379	DNV	B+C
2021LNG	not published	7.78	10.46	−26%	86 of 289	DNV	B+C
2020LNG	not published	9.04	10.71	−16%	81 of 267	DNV	B+C
2019LNG	not published	33.56	10.87	+209%	235 of 248	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2018LNG	not published	8.19	10.92	−25%	41 of 197	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.